Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+look\s+to\s+rate\s+sheet\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+look\s+to\s+rate\s+sheet\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] New look to rate sheet (score: 1): Author: "Dick-w0raa" <w0raa@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:50:58 -0600; I just received the new ARRL Contest Update and the new look is really nice. Ward did a great job and it's a real pleasure to read. Dick W0RAA _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00441.html (6,488 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] New look to rate sheet (score: 1): Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 19:31:45 -0400; Well, it didn't make it here, Dick. I wonder whether that nice HTML content is causing all the spam filters to zap the email. Anyone else not receive it today? Never missed the biweekly text version.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00447.html (7,909 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] New look to rate sheet (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:41:01 -0700; It's a very good upgrade from the Rate Sheet. Ward is doing excellent work here, even if he did put the "Busted QSOs" section up front in big letters! If you'd like to _skim_ the issue, or read throu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00448.html (9,504 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] New look to rate sheet (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 05:52:53 -0500; I didn't get it either, and I get plenty of unwanted HTML e-mails. Bill W5VX Well, it didn't make it here, Dick. I wonder whether that nice HTML content is causing all the spam filters to zap the ema; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00450.html (8,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]