Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+No\s+advantage\s+to\s+assisted\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:32:41 -0500
Some further clarifications for ARRLDX Phone 2014. VY2ZM SO vs. K4XS assisted On bands where VY2ZM had a big advantage, assisted was of little help to K4XS. You can't hear them if you can't work them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00183.html (14,968 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:41:38 -0500
How widespread is this practice? Everyone talks about it but I've never heard any statistics. Given human nature, I assume the worst, too, but some real data would be better. Everyone talks about ali
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00184.html (7,861 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:45:11 -0500
Better to ask the log checkers. However, when I operated from KH6 and had a packet pileup, some well known unassisted guys would show up on a pretty regular basis. Just chance? Only they, and the log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00185.html (7,916 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:15:07 -0600
Hi Bill, Isn't that a bit like saying it's impossible to have just come across your pileup by tuning? Were you hidden in some deep, dark corner of the band? Was there some mysterious phenomenon that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00188.html (9,929 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:46:27 -0600
Just wondering here, How would the log checkers know? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 12/12/2014 8:45 AM, K4XS via CQ-Contest wrote:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00190.html (8,869 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:03:07 +0100
Most easy with the busted calls in unassisted logs for example 73 Peter Just wondering here, How would the log checkers know? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00191.html (9,952 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: VE5ZX <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:57:58 -0600
Most easy with the busted calls in unassisted logs for example With the improving accuracy of RBN spots (Thanks Pete and others) soon one will have to look for increased accuracy not a decreased accu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00194.html (8,081 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:04:08 +1100
Its all part of the world of contesting - When a single op is happy to put someone else in the chair while he rests and still enters the log as SOAB - if that keeps him happy then the rest of us just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00196.html (9,712 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu