Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Not\s+just\s+long\s+calls\s+slowing\s+things\s+down\:\s+getting\s+delayed\s+responses\s+when\s+S\&Ping\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Not\s+just\s+long\s+calls\s+slowing\s+things\s+down\:\s+getting\s+delayed\s+responses\s+when\s+S\&Ping\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Not just long calls slowing things down: getting delayed responses when S&Ping (score: 1): Author: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:00:06 +0000 (UTC); With the rise of SO2R, the fact that most multi-op stations have two active stations per active band (with interlocks) and the increase in remote operations, in the ARRL CW there was a noticeably hig; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00190.html (8,440 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not just long calls slowing things down: getting delayed responses when S&Ping (score: 1): Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:46:29 +0000 (UTC); Yes, those badly using interlocks were sometimes very noticeable in the ARRL CW. I was not able to operate very much over the weekend so when I was running stations there were often many calling me.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00195.html (9,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]