- 1. [CQ-Contest] Not quite unassisted (AKA "Dead Horse") (score: 1)
- Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:22:19 -0500
- Ham-1 wrote in his SS CW comments: " Good guy kudos to [Ham-2] and [Ham-3] who took the time to spot [Ham-4]'s section 'needs.' " I did not mention the real calls because they are, in fact, all "good
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00221.html (8,386 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not quite unassisted (AKA "Dead Horse") (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:25:59 -0500
- ...snip.. I have a set of guidance too... If you are using a radio, amp, wire, tower, antenna, rotor etc, that was not designed by YOU, made by YOU, from raw materials that YOU YOURSELF mined from th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00245.html (7,840 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not quite unassisted (AKA "Dead Horse") (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 07:33:12 -0800
- Actually, one of the usual top ten Sweepstakes ops did build not only the operating desk, but the entire building his station is housed in. He uses Kenwood radios, though. -- Kenneth E. Harker WM5R k
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00260.html (8,532 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu