Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+OOF\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+OOF\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] OOF! (score: 1): Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:55:03 -0500; N5KO wrote: "All parties gave support [for Cabrillo] without hesitation except for CQ -- the CQ representative said 'CQ will give support, but only if you remove 'ARRL' from the name.' Oof!" I agree; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00126.html (7,860 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] OOF! (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:04:06 -0800 (PST); (opening a premium can o' worms) Now if both entities could come together on using LoTW (and eQSL) for both ARRL and CQ awards... LoTW seems like a better option for those seeking USCA than eQSL. Jus; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00130.html (10,695 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] OOF! (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:08:02 -0600; Add August, 1968, p. 10, paragraphs 3 and 5. Referenced from the October article. 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00138.html (7,591 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] OOF! (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:45:01 -0800; ARRL members can read these online: "W9WNV Sues ARRL". May, 1968, p. 81. http://p1k.arrl.org/cgi-bin/topdf.cgi?id=55698&pub=qst "League Lines". August, 1968, p. 10, paragraphs 3 and 5. http://p1k.arr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00144.html (9,567 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]