Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Operator\s+error\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Operator\s+error\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:04:34 -0500; I used computer logging (CT) for the first time at home in SS CW. Because I'm still learning, I sent all fills with the paddles. I'm pretty sure that a couple of times, when asked "NR?", I wrongly se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00193.html (8,308 bytes)
2. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:38:00 -0000; Hello Art and the Contest Gang This can and does happen with other logging programs also you don't have to be using a hand key to have it happen if you log the contact and somone wants a repeat of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00203.html (9,645 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:02:45 -0700; also you don't have to contact and somone hurry the NUMBER for the it and sometimes I remember it or catch its the Other guy who -- I thought I read somewhere that, since this happens so often, log c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00218.html (9,335 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "W7TMT" <w7tmt@dayshaw.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:04:07 -0800; Art, Here in the WWA section this past weekend one of our best operators had a problem in which he was inadvertently sending out two different checks depending on whether he was using his "CQ" or "S&; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00219.html (9,786 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: W7GG <w7gg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:47:41 -0800; Why not identy this fine this world class op? He is a high integrity contester and an excellent op on both CW and SSB. He does things from the "black hole" of the Pacific NW that the rest of us also; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00223.html (11,522 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Operator Error (score: 1): Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:51:05 -0800; With regard to the inconsistent sending of precedence, checks and sections, my understanding is that the log checking software is smart enough to flag such stations' exchange as "unstable." Receiving; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00226.html (8,737 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:24:59 -0500; Art, I do the ARRL 10M logchecking, and we allow a for plus or minus one tolerance on the recent number to handle situations such as this. This was recommended by the ARRL, and I'm pretty sure the SS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00234.html (9,599 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator Error (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:23:49 -0500; On Nov 10, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote: With regard to the inconsistent sending of precedence, checks and sections, my understanding is that the log checking software is smart enough to fla; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00241.html (9,483 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator Error (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Younker" <SunGodX@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:35:50 -0800; -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net> To: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net> Cc: "Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:23 PM Su; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00243.html (9,992 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@thepoint.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 04:38:34 -0000; Dave, I can't imagine this being true. Either the exchange is right or it's wrong. Following that logic if I work another station and he copies me as K9GY (sorry, Eric) he'd get credit for it because; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00244.html (11,797 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:58:36 -0500; The case under discussion is not at all the same as miscopying IL for IN, for which no-one is arguing that the log checking should not be strict. The point here is that the station on the other end c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00257.html (11,531 bytes)
12. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:47 -0000; Rex K7QQ mistake, screen. what I wrong. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00287.html (12,574 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:02:56 +0000; Here's another example: I call CQ and get an answer. The caller sends his call wrong, and I call what he sent. If he doesn't correct it, who gets dinged? I think I do, even though I didn't make the m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00293.html (12,904 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator error (score: 1): Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:22:53 +0000; Hi Kelly, I agree with what you said, except I can envision a set of circumstances where the log checker wouldn't be able to tell who was the one making the error. In the above example you shouldn't; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00315.html (16,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]