Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Opinion\:\s+SO\-unassisted\s+should\s+not\s+be\s+using\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Opinion\:\s+SO\-unassisted\s+should\s+not\s+be\s+using\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Opinion: SO-unassisted should not be using CW Skimmer (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:01:12 -0500; Big difference? No, maybe and yes. No -- in the sense of the primary benefit provided to the operator. The ARRL has taken the position that local skimmer spots, remote skimmer spots and packet spots; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00001.html (10,712 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 21
Page: [1] [2]