- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:56:47 -0600
- Hmmmm. I think that attitude is very hard toward this young fellow David. I'm a serious DXer and not a contest entrant, but if you had highlighted me in that way, I would have told you where to stuff
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00429.html (8,610 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:10:59 -0600
- Apology? For what? Reporting what was going on with packet spots? Hardly! So John, what would your magnanimous approach be toward resolving this perceived issue? 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN ______________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00431.html (10,381 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:33:59 -0500
- Suffice it to say that the young fellow did indeed need feedback. Feedback to the Noobs is a delicate proposition in any endeavor, not just contesting. Whoever does it has to make a quick psych asses
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00440.html (10,688 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:45:17 -0500
- Dunno about what John would do, but if it were my contest, I'd thank David for the find, then I'd send personal email to the new guy explaining exactly what the problem was, and why he was not copace
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00441.html (9,769 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:21:11 -0600
- Some things cause ones' mind to boggle. This is one of them. Did no one read the two posts from PY8AZT? Here they are - summarized: "Just to give a feedback on the report of the spots K1TTT, where in
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00444.html (10,866 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:06:34 -0600
- Bob, I don't think anyone thinks the issue should be ignored. It's more about the approach to resolving the issue. Since I have been visiting this reflector, I have learned that the approach to resol
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00447.html (12,758 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:02:53 -0600
- David, Thanks for speaking out. We need some credible spokesmen for the minority positions. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00452.html (9,565 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:59:52 -0600
- Maybe the proper message should be that the rules don't matter? Is that the bigger picture? And Dave was supposed to know the entire situation before he posted the list. Get real, the kid unknowingly
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00456.html (10,705 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: "Dick-w0raa" <w0raa@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:26:48 -0700
- Let a sleeping dog lie. The kid apologized. It's over. Let's get on with our lives. Is this going to go on and on for the next 2-3 months? W0RAA _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00459.html (11,445 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
- Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:02:55 +0000
- Yes, or until we get some sunspots. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00463.html (9,246 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu