The continuous complaining about packet is really interesting. It is interesting because you can blame almost anything on packet. I think that the attention on packet is obscuring other possible issu
A Multi station could have "listening posts" And since the Omni VII does 6 meters, you could be your own captive rover for VHF contests! 73s John W5TD ________________________________________________
This topic has always facinated me. For a few reasons. The main one is this: If a remote station exists in KP4. All Transmitters and antennas are connected by wires within a 500m circle or property b
In that scenario, no contest rules would be broken, as far as I can tell. Contacts would count for DXCC because of Rule 9 (remote operating points must be located within the same DXCC Entity as the t
That should have read: WOULD NOT COUNT for DXCC... Type faster than I can read sometimes Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list C
I've been playing with remote station control via the internet, and find that the audio latency makes it impractical for contesting on phone or CW. Casual operating is a hoot, though! I've since work
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Isn't the small amount of equipment at the Colorado QTH part of the "transmitter"? You can't transmit without it, can you? Bill W6WRT ___________________________