Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s+luck\s+or\s+pot\s+luck\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s+luck\s+or\s+pot\s+luck\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Packet luck or pot luck? (score: 1): Author: "Martin Luther" <luther7@bigpond.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:26:22 +1100; If you have been here a while you will have seen various missives from me raising the undesirable effects that worldwide packet spotting is having on contesting. This is a new one. I was working in t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00035.html (8,516 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet luck or pot luck? (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:00:53 -0000; How about if you create your own luck by spotting yourself on packet and then saying...ooooops.... Or have a nearby neighbor who just happens to be a packet-cluster sysop spot you. I don't operate in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00049.html (10,875 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet luck or pot luck? (score: 1): Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:26:49 -0500; Mal, Let me splain it to ya. Whereas your conclusion is a possible scenario, it is not necessarily the only, or even the most common one. Some contesting s/w have a feature called "spot all S&P QSOs"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00067.html (9,599 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Packet luck or pot luck? (score: 1): Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>; Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:40:07 -0500; I operated as W1FJ. Upon my request, K1TTT gave me the spots generating by the W1FJ station. I spotted 8 DX stations on 7038 QSX 7154 between Mar 4/0753-0807z... and three at 0920z. This occurred bec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00096.html (9,754 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]