Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Penalty\s+POINTS\,\s+not\s+QSOs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Penalty\s+POINTS\,\s+not\s+QSOs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Penalty POINTS, not QSOs (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:56:44 +0000 (GMT); No, that never happens. No additional QSOs are removed. Additional points are removed. de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00223.html (6,658 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Penalty POINTS, not QSOs (score: 1): Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:34:26 -0700; No, that never happens. No additional QSOs are removed. Additional points are removed. That seems like a distinction without a difference And, in the SS log check report it says: These will be remove; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00226.html (8,169 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Penalty POINTS, not QSOs (score: 1): Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 01:42:10 +0000; 2Q is correct. My bad! The punishment is a deduction of points, not a deduction of Q's. I suppose that fine distinction makes it "all better". Dit Dit HB _____________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00227.html (7,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]