Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Petition\s+to\s+Ban\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 08:43:24 -0400
I'm intrigued to note that while this petition has been being pushed through individual e-mails, it has not yet even been mentioned on cq-contest. Could it be that the sponsors realize theirs is a mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00099.html (8,235 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 10:18:08 -0500
If that's true (and I believe that it is) then you have made the case for not allowing Skimmer in CW Sweepstakes. 73, de Hans, K0HB Just a boy and his radio -- ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00101.html (7,688 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 09:24:03 -0500 (CDT)
I still think there ought to be a separate "Skimmer" class. That way, no one does anything to violate the rules, the Skimmer users comnpete against themselves, and everyone else not using Skimmer com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00106.html (9,157 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 10:55:24 -0400
So what is the worst that happens? Somebody in Assisted class wins CWSS. That's why I say make a place for it, while not foreclosing competition among people who don't chose to use it. 73, Pete N4ZR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00108.html (8,261 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 10:24:51 -0500
Pete's hit the nail on the head on three counts: it is certainly possible some are overestimating the impact of skimmer. It is also true that new technology should not be banned. And it is also true
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00110.html (8,655 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 12:16:02 -0600
The question I have, straight forward - no hidden agenda, no ultimate goals... very simple, why is skimmer being considered? This is a serious question with multi guess answers. 1. to gain a scoring
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00116.html (9,601 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:42:34 +0100
... All competitive activities, interests and hobbies apply limits on technology, either because the technology is deemed to be inappropriate or because it could change the nature of the activity con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00119.html (8,739 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:56:24 -0400
Of course it's ironic. It also shows that this challenge is nothing but a knee-jerk reaction to change. It is a rear guard action by those who have not accepted that "proficiency in CW by ear" is no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00120.html (13,294 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 23:16:55 +0300
... ... Even as it was once threatened, the pre-filled instant lead pencils were not banned. But they vanished. They have simply become less popular in the past 18 years. But I tell you there would h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00125.html (9,105 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 20:32:58 +0000
So just where DO you draw the line... no computer keying? No computer logging(now REQUIRED in some contests)?? No web access for propagation data, only what you can copy from wwv on the air?? No aut
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00128.html (11,218 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
You know what would be truly revolutionary... If N1MM could log, score and generate the appropriate cabrillo logs for all of this past weekends QSO party from a single file. THAT would be a killer ed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00129.html (10,236 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 21:12:38 -0500
Why does every suggestion that there remain a skimmerless category, just like there remains a packetless category, result in someone arguing a point that is not made? I only said a skimmerless catego
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00136.html (11,964 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 19:21:48 -0700
Hi Zack I also wonder how many P5's, VU7's, 3C7's, VK0's, etc will be calling CQ. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00137.html (8,532 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 23:46:00 -0400
A locally operated Skimmer is completely different than a network of skimmers. Data from outside is assistance, data from one's own station, unless it is generated by a second human operator, is not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00141.html (14,600 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 10:04:35 +0000
One thing is for sure: This subject has certainly charged the emotions. I don't support the idea of an all-out ban on use of skimmer technology in contesting, so I will not sign the petition. However
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00142.html (12,612 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "doug smith" <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 08:49:52 -0500
I don't see what's such a big deal. The cat got out of the bag long ago. When I got into contesting back in the 1970s, you had to know the prefix tables and the WAZ map. If you worked EA8M2 and logge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00146.html (10,380 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu