Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Phonetics\,\s+back\s+to\s+basics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Phonetics\,\s+back\s+to\s+basics\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1): Author: Antti Nevantaus <antti.nevantaus@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:30:03 +0200; As I'm not a native English speaker, in my earlier days of ham radio I sometimes found it difficult with weak signals to get the callsign correctly due to non-standard phonetics. There are usually tw; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00642.html (7,417 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1): Author: "N7BF" <alan-ham@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:11:13 -0800; I am hoping that most of the people who are talking about using phonetics that are suppposed to be amusing, are talking about using them mostly during domestic contests, where the listeners are much; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00647.html (9,496 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:16:48 -0600; I would strongly suggest that each station use what works best in the majority of circumstances and if not standard, then revert to standard as soon as it appears the non-standard phonetics aren't wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00648.html (9,244 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:04:24 -0600; I consider this information as a pot of Gold. Thanks :0) Any other understanding you can give us as to the hearers ear please do. For example I have heard it mentioned many times especially lately on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00652.html (9,337 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1): Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:46:22 +0200; ... Florida is easier to say than Foxtrot. A lot easier. One can potentially copy it better, too. At least if you have some R in the FloRida. Bravo is OK to most, I think. At least if you use some R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00655.html (8,080 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:35:32 EST; I hope we were just having some fun with the clever phonetics and some of you did not take it as a mandate for competitive contest work. The only time cute phonetics have any advantage might be rag-c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00659.html (7,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]