Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Post\s+WAE\s+log\s+massaging\.\s+What\s+do\s+you\s+think\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:53:52 +0000
Got this email. What do you think about it? Dear Friend! We had QSO in WAE contest. I got from you serial no 88 on 40m. Also QTC: 2355Z 7018Khz W2UP 9/9 2345 UW8SM 324 2346 DL1ARJ 148 2348 DR4A 927 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00197.html (7,404 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:06:20 -0000
This is very poor sportsmanship and possibly cheating. According to the WAEDC web site, the contest manager is DF7ZS. Email df7zs@dxhf.darc.de I forwarded a copy of the email I received to him. It is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00204.html (8,996 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:45:42 -0500
Bad joss to send any corrections before the submission deadline, and bad for his reputation for soliciting corrections. My 1 1/2 cents worth. 73, Rusty, na5tr ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00206.html (9,865 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:52:50 -0400
Well, anyone reviewing the latest claimed scores for WAE CW sent out on this reflector August 16 can pretty much figure out who sent you the email. I also worked him but didn't get the email ! Stu KC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00207.html (9,582 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:54:13 -0700
I'd say that looks a lot like this posted score from OM2VL: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2007-08/msg00576.html -- Kenneth E. Harker WM5R kenharker@kenharker.com http://www.kenharke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00208.html (9,780 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:31:50 +0000 (GMT)
P U How's that? de Doug KR2Q Or maybe D Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00211.html (7,800 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:48:36 +0100
. Is it so bad? After all, DARC allows entrants to record QTCs, for post-WAE log-entry or massaging. An additional non-amateur-radio, post-WAE means of massaging QTCs will hardly make a difference. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00212.html (8,782 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Pascoe" <davekm3t@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:18:35 -0400
I think the answer is simple - and you were being far too kind by not listing the callsign. As a good friend of mine is known to say: the best disinfectant for cheaters is sunlight. And I agree with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00213.html (8,531 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:30:41 -0500
To the contesting community, at large (i.e., no one person specific)... I'm going step up to the pulpit and give you my opinion regarding this situation (whether you want to hear it or not!). First,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00224.html (9,256 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post WAE log massaging. What do you think? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:29:05 -0000
You could think of it as the next logical step beyond <alt-f8>, sort of a super-super-check-partial. The days when contesting was about "a boy, his skills, and his radio" are extinct. <sigh> 73, de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00232.html (8,842 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu