Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Posting\s+Scores\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:06:49 -0700
You've got to be kidding! I have zero interest in posting my scores, or in watching the scores of others. If others do, they are certainly welcome to do so. I also don't participate in Russian contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00114.html (9,850 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:55:13 -0700
Once a year I do a triathlon with my daughter, and at 74, along with the usual 5k runs. I am not really competing with anybody. The whole idea is to become a "finisher". It is an athletic event to op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00117.html (9,702 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: xe2b <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:40:52 -0600
Hello fellow contesters!  Also, for this WPX SSB,  I will be posting on real time my scores on http:// cqcontest.net. And possibly, video streaming off the same page. 73 Luis XE2B Enviado desde mi Sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00120.html (9,566 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:19:10 -0400
Rick, with all due respect, I have to agree with Jim, especially on the attitude. If something like that depends on one person's mood, especially if such person is probably mentally unstable, then I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00121.html (11,095 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:18:53 -0400
Sorry to be so sarcastic but why? I have to agree with K9YC 100%. I guess I don't see the purpose of these real-time contest websites anyway. Maybe it's just an ego booster for the haves vs. the have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00122.html (8,353 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:34:12 -0600
So many closed minds............. Think outside the box. Think about how this or something else might encourage other people to get into radio. There was a time here in Colorado where a close group o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00127.html (9,207 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Dave Mueller <daven2nl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:28:08 -1000
As a serious SOAB competitor, I don't want to see how my competition is doing. I always want to think that I am on the verge of losing, so I don't slack on the 2nd radio and keep pushing to do the be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00128.html (10,912 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Milam, N9KY" <N9KY@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:44:00 -0500
I kept the online scoreboard open once during a contest, and I realized I was running close behind someone in my entry class--it kept me pushing hard through the last hours of the contest and gave me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00129.html (9,599 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Phillips <stu@ridgelift.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:29:14 +0000
The server only reported QSO and point total by submitter. Discussions within our club resulted in us thinking that band and multiplier break downs conveyed more information on individual strategy t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00130.html (10,527 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:26:05 -0700
I've been reading this thread and having a hard time understanding why anyone who is seriously competing would want to tell their competitors how they are doing. I've never looked at a scoreboard, ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00131.html (9,296 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jeffrey Embry <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:43:16 -0400
I can't speak for others, but I will say watching the scores will be my way of participating this weekend as I will not be able to play due to recovering from surgery that is scheduled for Friday. So
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00132.html (10,663 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:07:47 -0600
Nobody if forcing anyone to do anything. How can we possibly share the excitement and fun a better way? Even if every contest had a scoreboard feature nobody said you had to look at it. How boring wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00133.html (12,060 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:16:36 -0600
So how do you handle contests with Serial numbers........... Yeah we loved to get on 75m SSB from this area to see just how badly we got beat in DX contests. Every thing I see is you are afraid of so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00134.html (12,240 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:08:17 -0400
Fully agree with Dave. Consider this analogy - one of my sons in is a world class gamer who builds his own computers. He explains in Korea they have pro gaming competitions where competitors are up o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00135.html (14,433 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:11:33 -0400
I have no problem at all with someone who wants to use Live Scoring if they think it enhances their contest experience. When someone starts demanding, or at least insisting, that those who do not agr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00136.html (12,784 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:41:37 -0600
I am broadcasting live at http://ustre.am/1mqMS come and check it out! 3/26/2015 at 0341z _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00137.html (12,570 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 01:01:02 -0700
I don't think anyone missed anything. The point of Rick's post was that submitting real time scores should be an obligation. That's just silly. Our only obligation is to compete fairly and honestly.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00139.html (11,079 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:54:34 -0400
I can't speak for others, but N1MM Logger+ gives you the option of *not* providing band breakdowns, so I can't see how serious competitors give away anythingif the scoreboard doesn't show what band y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00141.html (11,909 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:02:40 +0000 (UTC)
Because it turns contesting into a competition with spectators, because it makes the competition more competitive, because it motivates people...for all the reasons most sports are public events. Rud
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00144.html (10,641 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:17:34 -0400
While I don't agree with strong arming into the use of something, I do believe that this discussion is one of many that defines one that is much more fundamental. If you are "connected" - define "con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00145.html (9,764 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu