Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Posting\s+Scores\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:39 -0500
is going to do that. Who among us has ever actually watched someone operating a radio contest? /sarcasm_on CW or RTTY contest: [15 minutes of silence and keyboard clicking] Dammit! [more silence and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00146.html (10,331 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
I am not a golfer.  Even if I happen to stumble onto a tournament scoreboard, it will not infect me with a motivation to go to a golf course, let alone challenge Tiger to a match. I won't develop a p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00147.html (9,939 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:25:25 -0700
That is NOT what he said. Here's what he said, and why I and others reacted so strongly. = = = = = = = = = ".I feel very strongly that if you USE the technology to have packet, or skimmer assistance,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00148.html (9,230 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:19:39 -0400
I could not agree more, Ward. You reap what you sow. If you are at the top of the game in contesting, you get there due to your hard work and skill -- but, you are also there because you have all tho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00151.html (12,505 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:14:38 -0600
and somehow that has been contrived into being strong armed........ Lets pass the message around another 100 times and see what we get. Mike W0MU On 3/26/2015 9:25 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On Wed,3/25/20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00152.html (9,943 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:25:15 -0600
I have found most people that are not in Ham Radio are very interested and intrigued in contesting and that we fly to islands in the Caribbean and setup field day style operations so we can talk to l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00153.html (12,084 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:15:32 -0500
Interesting discussion. I can understand why some people do not want to post all their data. What would be wrong with only showing the total score in real time, or near real time? This would not be g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00154.html (10,479 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:24:41 -0400
Hans, I don't think I ever claimed it was the whole answer to enticing new people into our sport, but to pursue your analogy, what if a scoreboard were combined with one, or many live streams, or eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00155.html (10,963 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: dt <wd5r@ozarkisp.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:23:31 -0500
I had a strong inclination to express my view about that phrase. Being timid and uneducated in Political Correct format, I refrained from getting my boots wet. However I was pleased to see that Jim,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00156.html (8,133 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:31:24 -0700
Anyone serious about winning isn't going to waste their time posting their score. Every minute counts I believe that enticing others into contesting is better served by inviting them to a station to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00157.html (9,547 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:40:43 +0200
Nah. Jim would not use scoreboard as he would not use skimmers. No need for that. Jim is one of the guys who still can use the radio without computer. Gosh - I reckon Jim could still use the paddle .
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00158.html (11,701 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: xe2b <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:38:20 -0600
Well, actually there is no "waste" because it is automaticatelly done by the logger (in my case N1MM). And of course, it can be can set it up days in advance.  Luis Enviado desde mi Samsung Mobile de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00159.html (10,059 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:10:33 +0000
<snip> We need the networked contesters as well. And what ever comes after that, I say we need them too. When amateur radio becomes just one more cog in the Internet of Things, it will have ceased to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00160.html (9,127 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 06:29:26 -0600
Let's get something straight. The posting of scores is done automatically by the contest logging software. There is no "wasting of time" by the operator. 73, Steve, N2IC _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00161.html (9,034 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:46:44 -0400
While we are on the subject of the need to "give back" for those using internet tools, how about "spotting what you hear" if you are using packet cluster in an SSB contest. For CW, with RBN, the clus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00162.html (9,144 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:50:14 -0400
It seems that you appose on principle, Jim. Posting your score is automatic in ALL the software clients, all you have to do is enable it. It requires ZERO effort on your part during the contest. As I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00164.html (11,297 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:18:10 -0400
From my experience, the decision to spot is largely a judgement of what one thinks would be interesting for somebody to work. In my time at the K8AZ multiop efforts, when on the multiplier station, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00165.html (10,306 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 21:55:27 -0400
dS = dQ/T 73, AB1J In a message dated 2015-03-28 11:21:55 P.M. Coordinated Universal Ti, pokane@ei5di.com writes: <snip> When amateur radio becomes just one more cog in the Internet of Things, it wil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00166.html (8,882 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:43:59 -0700
Obviously, interesting to one operator is boring to others. BUT -- I find it VERY useful to know who is hearing what on various bands, and especially around my frequency. Example -- tonight, I was ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00167.html (9,168 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:12:05 -0700
Steve, you may be right. You may be wrong. "Straight" or not. I seriously doubt that my DOS computer with TRLOG running has this feature. One thing of which I am certain, it is NEVER connected to the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00169.html (9,991 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu