Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Proposed\s+Rule\s+Change\s+\-\s+CQWW\s+PHONE\s+\-\s+SK\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve GW4BLE" <GW4BLE@btconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:51:01 -0000
I think we can close the thread on this one now; the last line on my original post of November 5th read - (anyone wish to second this, and forward to committee for consideration? I tried in previous
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00439.html (9,082 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:05:31 +0000
GW4BLE continued: Yes, R1 bandplan can stay in R1 where it belongs. Far greater damage caused to far greater amateurs by your country's OTH radar operating from ZC4. Unlike R1 bandplan, ITU-RR Table
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00451.html (7,484 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK (score: 1)
Author: "LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad" <la5he@otterstad.dk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:35:03 +0100
I think we can close the thread on this one now; the last line on my original post of November 5th read - (anyone wish to second this, and forward to committee for consideration? I tried in previous
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00471.html (9,766 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:00:06 +0200
I oppose... Providing the question is unnecessarily resticting the allowed usage of 40m in R1. Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00473.html (8,260 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu