Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\s*$/: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:39:24 -0700; Was hoping to stay clear of this... number of reasons.. First and obvious to most, not a huge player. I just like to be competitive. And that turns out to be very much with myself. There isn't a huge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00360.html (9,811 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:06:54 +0100; That does not sound logical to me, who searches a dx expedition log for the possibility they made a mistake and put his call in the log? And how many out of some thousand qsos are busted with a diffe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00361.html (9,621 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:17:49 +0100; Peter Voelpel a écrit : Example n.2: You hear the DXpedition and decide to dive into the pileup. You swith on your multi megawatt amplifier and call, call, call, call, call. No need to listen,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00363.html (9,930 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:33:57 -0700; Looks like Joe already has voted with his feet. Out of 147K QSO's in my LoTW account, 0 QSO's with W4TV or his old call, AD8I. Just another armchair quarterback in the contest world. 73, Steve, N2IC; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00365.html (9,353 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:39:19 -0700; Or better yet scan the logs for calls close to yours and submit the card and hope the QSL manager feels that the dxpedition busted the call and send a card anyway. ___________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00366.html (10,080 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:49:21 +0000; Oh! Oh! I have the solution to published logs vs DXCC!!! DXCC changes their rules so that only qsl's submitted BEFORE the log is published are counted!! This would help speed the qsl process and prob; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00371.html (10,697 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:51:53 -0000; Don't look now, but LoTW is a white elephant. All it's "promise" remains basically a "promise" years after commissioning. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00372.html (8,426 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:47:38 -0000; 99.47% of statistics like this are made up on the spot. beep beep 73, de Hans, K0HB -- There are two simple rules to success in life. 1) Don't tell everything you know. _____________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00373.html (8,379 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:13:56 -0800; A more likely scenario (to use my own call sign) would be if I did a log lookup for a DXpedition for WM5R, found the two or three QSOs I made, but also one on a band mode I didn't work the DXpedition; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00374.html (9,919 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:39 -0600 (CST); IF I needed the band/mode/country for DXCC and IF I were to cheat, it would be very easy if all the QSO info were available on Internet. That's the only point I'm making. I have never cheated and nev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00375.html (10,109 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:51:43 -0600 (CST); All of the uploaded "logs" by Dxpeditions tht I have seen are merely search engines where you type in your call and it tells you which band/mode you worked them on. No other QSO info is displayed. 73; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00376.html (9,258 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:05:51 -0500; It obviously happens enough (or is believed to happen enough) that the two programs have adopted rules/policies to address it. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ CQ-Co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00377.html (10,980 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:32:29 -0800 (PST); Honestly, I'd rather have UBNs for all the major contests. At least, I can do something to improve based on that information. It's hard enough to analyze my own errors without trying to figure out if; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00383.html (9,442 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:48:12 -0700; Oh, sorry, I forgot to mention that I also checked K4IK and W8IK. More zeros. Any other calls I should check ? And, by the way, that goes back to 1991 - the earliest logs I have uploaded to LoTW. So,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00390.html (9,256 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:51:04 -0500; A very insightful and important comment Dale. Someone looking in on this group might take one look, and decide that contesters are all cheaters, or at least the ones who ever won a contest, and that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00395.html (9,853 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:01:26 -0600 (CST); No one can search the DXpedition logs as they are right now to cheat. Unless they actually heard the other station (as in the W9SG example I gave) work them. Full QSO data is not displayed in any log; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00396.html (10,758 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:09:42 -0500; That works until the guy the DXpedition REALLY worked also sends in for a card, and the cheater is SO busted. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00403.html (10,839 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:18:13 -0500; Interesting since of the logs I have on-line I show QSOs with N2IC in CQ160 1983, ARRL 10M 2005 and NAQP 2006. Since I rarely spend any time in domestic contests, that's not a bad number of "hits."; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00406.html (11,156 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:20:27 -0000; You can't imagine how many times I've been put in logs as UO1HE, VO1SE, V01HE, etc. I'll send a card to the station or manager and, if he puts 2 and 2 together, I get a card. If not, I have to wait u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00409.html (12,405 bytes)
40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Yury VE3XB" <ve3xb@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:27:06 -0500; If I make my contest log public it's not good. If I put the audio files of the very same contest on my webpage (the way K5ZD does) - it's OK. Obviously the content is the same, so the question is WHY; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00413.html (7,804 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]