Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\s*$/: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:38:57 +0000; That's what I've seen, and that's what I hope they do. But their announcements say they'll upload the log. I hope they don't go all the way, I need their DXCC credit ;o((((( Steve, K0XP _____________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00418.html (9,256 bytes)
42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:22:34 -0500; A good point, Joe. I was intrigued that the DXCC blog specifically states that if they can be sure published logs can't be changed, then it actually would be better to publish them. I think this sugg; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00419.html (15,840 bytes)
43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:06:51 -0600 (CST); Me too. I only need 8 more to make HR but a couple of them might actually show in a contest some day (A9, EP, YA). I almost worked an A9 in a contest a few years ago. I don't hope for A5, P5, FR/G, 3; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00430.html (9,996 bytes)
44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:59:55 -0800; If you examine the archives for this reflector, you'll find that that discussion has been going on here, with the occasional lull, for about 11 years now. Public logs is one solution to the problem f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00437.html (9,471 bytes)
45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:06:41 -0500; You think that's bad? I wonder to this day how many QSL cards N3VAW got because DX stations (oddly enough, primarily US-based ops) couldn't understand that my old call's prefix was WN3. And I wonder; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00438.html (10,932 bytes)
46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:10:04 -0500; Yup, if LoTW was working properly, I really should be HR #1 by now all by LoTW. I only have 272 confirmed by LoTW, 213 just on 15 meters. I want my money back. I wondered on another reflector if we'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00458.html (9,442 bytes)
47. [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "G4MKP" <g4mkp@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:06:36 -0800; I note Randy's (K5ZD) comment that the organisers reserve the right to make contest logs public - presumably after the fact. I can't think of a reason why I would object to any of my contest logs bei; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00489.html (6,736 bytes)
48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:14:18 -0500; For top tier logs, one sort-of valid reason is that it might reveal your winning operating strategies and knowledge of esoteric band openings. I'd like not to believe that it's because the extra scr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00490.html (7,345 bytes)
49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Tom Haavisto" <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:22:47 -0500; The only other reason I have seen mentioned is that if you closely look at a log, find someone who is close to your call, you can then trick him into sending you a QSL card, on the assumption he bust; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00493.html (9,140 bytes)
50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:58:36 -0800; Imagine a Football, Basketball, Baseball, Soccer or other major sporting event where only a final score was allowed to be published and nothing else (except for maybe the number of touchdowns or fiel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00496.html (8,028 bytes)
51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:38:29 -0600; "And I do not know why some people are so strongly against it. 73, Art K3KU" I am certainly no psychologist, but my instinct tells me that human beings are generally possessive and like to be in cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00498.html (8,367 bytes)
52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:50:55 -0600; [snip] I think you answered your own question, Art. Think of it as playing poker with all your cards face up on the table. You be the judge whether that would change anything. Despite other comments,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00502.html (8,964 bytes)
53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:34:32 -0600; For the CQWW, the rules clearly spell out "By submitting a log to the CQ WW Contest, the entrant agrees to have the log open to the public". If anyone has a problem with this, then not submitting a l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00503.html (8,845 bytes)
54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:36:40 -0800; On the rare occasion when I have a log worthy of interest, I would be only to happy to have it public; in fact, I would like to show it off. That said, I wonder if a policy of publishing all scores,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00504.html (10,542 bytes)
55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:37:15 -0800; If you send in a log, and claim a score, is it rocket science that how you got that score would be open to public scrutiny? Maybe those who do not want there logs to be public should also encrypt the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00505.html (10,528 bytes)
56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:08:21 -0500; Well put. 73 & Happy Holidays, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00506.html (9,315 bytes)
57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: K1AR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:44:41 EST; Guys, We beat this topic to death in July. It's probably time to move on unless you have something new to add to the thread. So far, what I've read is a re-hash of what was said a few months ago. Hop; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00507.html (8,290 bytes)
58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:51:48 -0800; Since my log in CQWW will always be too thin to win any award, the only reason I submit it is to help MWA in the "Club Competition". Not submitting would make me feel good about "retaining the priva; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00509.html (9,084 bytes)
59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:52:26 -0800; "I know not where he goeth, but I know from where he cometh, for I have seen the thing he speaketh of." Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good log. de Hans, K0HB __________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00510.html (8,962 bytes)
60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:23:10 -0500; "I think you answered your own question, Art. ... The fun is in the outwitting, and in some cases even the bluffing. Learning should be both challenging and rewarding, not spoon-fed." I agree with al; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00515.html (8,640 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]