Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Q\-Signals\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:16:47 -0400
Now that bad signal quality is a potential disqualifying event in certain contests, is there a simple way to alert somebody, especially on CW, that his signal has a quality issue? I can't find a Q si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00250.html (8,697 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 03:17:09 +0700
Q-signal for "I am experiencing non-natural RFI.......... it is QUFO to indicate origin of RFI. The other signal for CW is 575 ...readable perfect, strength above normal, and signal quality punk. 73C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00262.html (9,785 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:59:51 -0700
QSD = Your keying is defective, your signals are bad. This would work in principle, if we all knew our Q codes. ;) 73 jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00273.html (8,149 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 18:20:37 -0500
That makes me think here, RS(T) R= Readability S= Strength T= Tone Readability is the overall well readability with everything taken into account. Strength, QRM, QRN, etc. Strength is well strength T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00279.html (8,695 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Ole S. Andersen" <oz1fao@osa.dk>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:33:51 +0200
Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting certain CW, that recall which than QRI ? = How is the tone of my transmission? QRI The tone of your transmission is... 1. good. 2. variable. 3. bad. 73 Ole -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00306.html (8,394 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:22:23 -0400
There are many bad signal situations that are not bad tone. In the YT1A case I mentioned, the big thing was spurious signals (with good tone) +/- 400 Hz, plus I believe some phase noise. Others have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00313.html (9,674 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:05:04 -0500
QRI ? = How is the tone of my transmission? QRI The tone of your transmission is... 1. good. 2. variable. 3. bad. 73 Ole - oz4o I recommend QDQ. 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00316.html (8,455 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:43:51 -0400
Let's not beat around the bush. QSS 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00319.html (7,845 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: GMAIL <knason00@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:26:06 -0400
Thanks Ward! I laughed out loud for almost 30 seconds. Kevan N4XL I recommend QDQ. 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00322.html (8,582 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:05:47 +1000
RST - Readability Strength Tone Give them a real signal report --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Reublin NF4L Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00323.html (9,117 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:33:59 -0400
Jim - The answer is simple: The Contest Committee needs to start DQ'ing participants based on crappy CW signals - only then will the behavior change. I assume when that happens, the Committee will p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00326.html (9,023 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:14:15 +0700
On CW, if I got a 576, I know to look for something wrong; I do not need specifics from the sender... he already made my having a problem clear. On phone, I just say "Your audio is distorted or you a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00328.html (10,239 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu