Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRL\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRL\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 28 May 2005 19:38:09 -0500; This post was triggered by a specific station (you know who you are<grin>) but really is just a good general principle... IF YOU DON'T RESPOND TO A QRL? CALL, YOU'D BETTER EXPECT TO FIND SOMEONE ELSE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00399.html (8,358 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07:13 -0600; Hi Doug and all, I would add, that as a qrp op, and I'd like to feel that I do a fair job of getting along, with qrl?? asked before cq, that I don't appreciate any station, that dumps a cq on top, ex; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00402.html (8,762 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: aalaun@attglobal.net (Fred Laun K3ZO); Date: Sun Mar 11 11:04:10 2001; "It must be nice to be able to respond to a QRL? every minute or so while you are trying to work QSO's at the "ESP" level. I am sitting there trying to dig out a third tier station when you ask QRL..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00178.html (7,898 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: zf2nt@candw.ky (Bruce Sawyer); Date: Thu May 13 00:21:53 1999; K3ZO posts: "My stock answer is: 'If you had to move the dial to tell me it was in use, then it wasn't', and I mean it!" Then W4AN chimes in: "I just found a frequency in that 1KC-clear zone you are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00234.html (8,085 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: perring@texas.net (Bob Perring); Date: Thu May 13 09:39:15 1999; <snip> can't ==> I would tend to think that you are no longer contesting at this point. N5RP -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00236.html (6,776 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu May 13 10:23:29 1999; [snip] I don't think Bill or anyone else is an inconsiderate op. The facts are that when you have a big signal, the frequencies around you clear out. I learned this in this year's SSB WPX. This was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00238.html (9,299 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:15:38 -0400; Any of these methods (QRL?, ?, IE) still require common sense and courtesy. Many ops act like as long as they send one of these, unless they get some raving lunatic response they have established the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00119.html (8,296 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: "Jack Schuster" <w1wef@intergate.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:07:49 -0400; Outside of contests, I often send QRL? as a joke because noone is on the band anyway. This AM after a short CQ on 20 HK1AR came back and was 599, I was 579 down there from my car, and Tony said there; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00132.html (6,790 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:37:25 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- It's reasonable if they're running HP and you are running LP. Happens all the time. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00136.html (7,147 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:25:28 -0500 (EST); Following the Stew Perry Test, K3ZM had a cool 3830 post concerning signs of operating QRP. (He was not QRP this time, but has done so in the past). A brief excerpt: I did not operate QRP again this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00142.html (7,195 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:47:09 -0500 (EST); I am puzzled by the technique of asking QRL? and then starting a CQ about 1 or 1.5 seconds later. Even K4BAI probably cannot get to his paddle quick enough to reply. 73 KI7Y Following the Stew Perry; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00145.html (7,883 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:15:15 -0800; I think Fred Laun wrote the definitive statement about the use of QRL in contests. http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00178.html Note how he asks if a frequency is in us; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00146.html (6,955 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:04:05 -0700; While I have great respect for Fred, I don't agree with him on this. The bottom line is if you're loud and/or in a geographically superior location for the contest or condx at hand, you can do pretty; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00147.html (8,339 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:50:49 +0000; I think Fred Laun wrote the definitive statement about the use of QRL in contests. What Fred said at the time (2001) was somewhat controversial - and that much is unchanged. For example. "If I am ru; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00149.html (8,001 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: "Dave" <dave@n1ix.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:11:35 -0500; I agree that a simple "?" is enough. I the station is working SO2R I think their frequency is up for grabs. Dave N1IX What Fred said at the time (2001) was somewhat controversial - and that much is u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00150.html (9,048 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:49:37 -0500; "QRL?" is unambiguous. A simple "?" may be open to interpretation. During sweepstakes, I had a psychic contact with VY1EI. I only have wire antennas, they aren't positioned the best in the world to g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00151.html (9,704 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:33:14 -0600; I agree with K3ZO (thanks for finding this Tree) and just to stir the pot a little bit consider this scenario: I'm tuning across 40M and I hear W1ABC running guys. K6XXX calls W1ABC and they work eac; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00152.html (9,060 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1): Author: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:50:51 +0000; My thought: If he is good enough to respond to a QRL? Then he keeps it. 73,Guy, N7ZG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00159.html (10,410 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]