- 1. [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:21:28 EST
- Let's start the year out with some real controversy, stimulated by the thread that is just now dying down about QRP. Let me start out with a disclaimer. I know some really fine ops who engage in QRP
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00027.html (8,326 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:41:15 -0500
- This one always makes me laugh (then cry.) It's such a time-waster. When I'm really sleep-deprived, /QRP always makes me think of the taunt we used as kids: "Do you want a medal, or chest to pin it
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00049.html (10,396 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 13:58:42 -0600
- I agree with your practices. When I work a pile-up the only thing I want to hear is full callsigns. Anything else is just QRM. I get fed up with /qrp. A weak station with a long callsign and then the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00050.html (9,724 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Tessmer <Mike.Tessmer@hillmangroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:32:11 -0500
- QSL. Where does that leave the ARRL types who appended /135 to their calls a couple years ago? Where does that leave the CQ Magazine types who appended /60 to their calls recently? Where does that l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00054.html (8,593 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: kr2q@optonline.net
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 18:05:58 -0500
- Somebody have a "bad" New Years party experience? :-) Lids come in all flavors: QRP, QRO, Blue States, Red States, boyz and gerlz. What do you mean by "calling out of turn?" This is the CONTEST refle
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00055.html (8,574 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:11:26 -0800 (PST)
- It is not nice not to answer QSL's; at least via direct. What a shame Andrei EW1AR-NC2N Lids come in all flavors: QRP, QRO, Blue States, Red States, boyz and gerlz. What do you mean by "calling out o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00063.html (9,055 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: "Zoli Pitman HA1AG" <ha1ag@myway.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 03:49:47 -0500 (EST)
- Well... I think I can recall a KR2Q/QRP QSL from my collection with some graphics of small and big fishes... fwiw, zoli ha1ag _______________________________________________ No banners. No pop-ups.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00069.html (8,801 bytes)
- 8. [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:53:41 +0100
- Hello, I´m not too familiar with the US buro service. But I wonder about the possible problem in answering foreign (not domestic) QSL cards via the buro. I can´t imagine it as a money pro
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00070.html (8,765 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Allisette" <rallisette@cwgsy.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:26:47 -0000
- Dear Contesters, Whether signing /QRP is legal or not matters not jot or tittle. What matters is that it is unnecessary and irrelevant. I hold a semi-rare callsign. I am on the receiving end of small
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00073.html (12,501 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Wruble" <w7gg@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:48:42 -0800
- if this crappy thread doesn't stop pretty soon I'm gonna start signing /Qro ...... jeez its already been going on for 2 years....at least it seems like it..... why not take it to the QRP REFLECTOR fo
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00091.html (14,191 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu