Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRP\s+cheating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRP\s+cheating\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 17:02:54 -0400; Felipe, With all due respect to your unique position I would think that many would like to know what kind of antenna design devised by anyone, even Eric NP3A "with a degree of antenna design" extant; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00403.html (11,162 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 09:24:50 -0500; Herb, It does sound incredulous, to say the least. But even ground-wave signals can be subject to reflections and attenuations and cancellations and additions such that it's not completely outside th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00417.html (14,079 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 06:53:34 +1000; A double bazooka at the distance you describe would have a massive lobe - high angle into a QTH 125 Miles away. It would be very strong. Ask anyone who has used one. Felipe, With all due respect to y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00419.html (12,172 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:10 +1000; Thanks Herb, Saying "In all due respects" does not change the fact that you have a bigoted view on something that should not be in the public arena... In Australia we would call your statements defam; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00420.html (16,372 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 18:43:12 -0400; Trent, In all due respects such a high angle sky wave radiator would be nearly useless in working DX station thousands of miles away. It amounts to a cloud warmer A claim of the enhance signal by cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00421.html (13,814 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 20:11:16 -0400; Not really Trent in fact I did not take part in the TO7A "crucifixion" except by belatedly pointing out that during this event I was SWLing on 160 during the time period and did not hear the activity; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00422.html (17,365 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP Cheating (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:42:08 -0400; I will observe with GREAT INTEREST the signals coming from KP4KE's station with a verified 5W QRP signal. I have numerous times observed KP4KE claiming QRP and being the loudest Carib station on the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00427.html (9,004 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:10:13 -0700; I disagree. Herb's observations have a quite solid engineering basis, and he carefully laid them out. By contrast, the posts attempting to explain them away were nothing more than pseudo-science and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00431.html (10,199 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "Eric M. Guzman" <np3a@np3a.com>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:41:11 -0400; If the intention with the below is to mean Felipe is a supporter of KP4KE, then it is totally incorrect and far from the truth. It the other way around. As he mentioned on a previous e-mail, we chall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00433.html (9,974 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "XV4Y (Yan)" <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 06:13:27 +0700; Hi, Just my 2 cents to the discussion. 73, Yan. -- Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/ Yes, we need more than just "radiated power" to have a QSO. Even though, perhaps KP4KE's bazooka do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00436.html (10,215 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 03:23:21 +0200; Pedro is consistently one of the strongest stations on the low bands here in Germany, he certainly would detect any problem with his 160m antenna and for sure a 25db loss. 73 Peter Yes, we need more; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00438.html (8,576 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: KB8N via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 22:53:52 -0400; Is there not a archive of RBN readings for the contest(s) in question? Could the two (or more) stations SNR not be compared at various points around the world? If signal strengths between two station; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00440.html (9,571 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:50:49 -0400; Peter, I don't think there was any RBN active when this QRP world record on 160 was allegedly achieved. I was measuring ground wave signals that are very reliable without even considering skip possib; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00442.html (11,013 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Yan (XV4Y) <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:04:35 +0700; Hi Peter, Well, my point was not to criticize NP4A antennas, but to tell that you cannot draw conclusions with only one measurement. Also, no "real antenna" is perfectly omni-directional and it can s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00444.html (9,774 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:56:25 -0700; Yep. I've done it, with results similar to what Herb reports. You learn who has worked on their RX systems and who has not. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00446.html (8,632 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:30:10 -0600; let's face it "4.7 watts to any good antenna has considerable limitations on 160 meters. Just try it sometime. I have... and will again... WAS in one weekend on 160... QRP! NOT with a 4 sq either...; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00447.html (8,717 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 06:28:14 -0500; During a 2 year period I did 6 contests on 160m, 2 ARRL, 2 Stew Perry and 2 CQ 160m. Each contest I heard MS and the only NE state I needed but never could get so much as a ? from any of them! That w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00452.html (10,341 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:42:17 -0700 (PDT); Doesn't hurt to be in Wyoming either. It isn't the number of watts that makes you loud. It's the size of those watts. But spare us the weak signal mantra about how anyone running a large station wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00453.html (9,464 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:50:46 +0200; Can someone, or the moderator(s) explain to us Europeans that if we add a personal critical remark its publication is being refused and every time hams from the USA soil practises this, no one interf; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00459.html (10,926 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 18:12:11 +0200; Mark, what exactly is your problem? I am European as well... By the way, all successful qrp operation is depending on the listener site. 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00479.html (11,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]