Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSL\s+Bureau\s+Fee\s+Structure\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: N6NT@worldnet.att.net (Bruce Sawyer)
Date: Sat Aug 8 17:50:56 1998
Today I had an opportunity to "discuss" the results of the last ARRL BOD meeting with my division director, and during the course of the conversation he directed me to a place where I could find the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00148.html (9,889 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
Date: Sun Aug 9 06:12:16 1998
On Sat, 8 Aug 1998 16:50:56 -0700 "Bruce Sawyer" <N6NT@worldnet.att.net> writes: book. check Bruce, I believe you are confusing the OUTGOING BUREAU charges with the INCOMING BUREAU. Ever since the in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00150.html (9,405 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: na2n@ifam.com (Greg Becker)
Date: Sun Aug 9 09:38:30 1998
Well, I can't comment about "Big Contest Club", but I CAN tell you the members of the top-ranking Local category club voted overwhelmingly IN FAVOR of restructuring the Local criteria, in order to in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00152.html (8,988 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: jdroller@tricon.net (Jimmy D. Roller)
Date: Sun Aug 9 11:34:00 1998
At $4.00 per pound (about 155 cards), the cost is slightly over 2 1/12 cents per card. Even if you double the existing fee to $8.00, it's still just over a nickel a card. If you can beat those prices
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00155.html (8,434 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: N6NT@worldnet.att.net (Bruce Sawyer)
Date: Sun Aug 9 11:55:43 1998
Tom is, of course, correct in pointing out that my comments were poorly organized and failed to draw the distinction between the two different cost structures involved. There is a logical connection
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00158.html (11,315 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt)
Date: Mon Aug 10 11:46:54 1998
like 2 to 1 to expand the local club radius from 20 miles to 35 miles. As president of the River City Contesters (a local club), I have opposed this change as unneeded, as have all of our members. Bu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00164.html (9,881 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue Aug 11 12:42:21 1998
Bruce's (N6NT's) comments provoke this response... This spring, I experimented with QSLing every unique QSO (every QSO with a station not QSLed before on a given band and mode) made in the last 2 yea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00172.html (9,570 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: dgreig@ix.netcom.com (Dave Greig)
Date: Tue Aug 11 13:04:47 1998
As a sorter for the W5 Buro, I do have cards that pile up into the pounds for certain dxer's and contesters, in most cases, I do have envelopes for these people. But my main comment to the group is i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00177.html (10,408 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: Stephen.A.Mendelsohn@abc.com (Mendelsohn, Stephen A.)
Date: Tue Aug 11 14:33:19 1998
Gentlemen; while you counting the 32 cent stamps on the backs of the cards please consider the following minor points associated with the ARRL outgoing bureau: 1 - The people who work there have to g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00179.html (9,420 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: aalaun@ibm.net (Fred Laun K3ZO)
Date: Tue Aug 11 16:45:57 1998
I like QSL'ing even after 46 years of very active hamming. I keep an analog system of 11 books with calls of all the non-W's I have worked since I got the call K3ZO, and after each contest I carefull
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00182.html (9,327 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin)
Date: Tue Aug 11 18:15:54 1998
2 1/12 it's still I seem card for Don't forget that an ARRL-affiliated ham club can take and send member's cards, saving member's big bucks. The local DX club here takes care of 100% of the QSL ship
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00183.html (10,740 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: kh2d@kuentos.guam.net (Jim Kehler)
Date: Wed Aug 12 00:05:06 1998
In light of the fact that it's 1998, and that the electronic age is upon us, I think it's time maybe we rethink QSL cards altogether. I also think it's time to do this due to the fact that I have bee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00185.html (14,432 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@ij.net (Jim White, K4OJ)
Date: Wed Aug 12 20:55:02 1998
Question: with W8AH in the same state, why does anyone need a QSL from N4ZR at all? Fred........you do N4ZR a disservice, he is a special ham like all hams are and saying his QSL is not needed is NOT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00189.html (8,267 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: miltj@aepnet.com (Milt Jensen, N5IA)
Date: Wed Aug 12 08:07:32 1998
At 05:15 PM 8/11/98 -0500, Dale L. Martin wrote:>> Good morning Dale, I like this idea. It's a bit over 1,500 (yes, one THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED) MILES from my QTH in the western end of the 5th District
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00190.html (9,699 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: rmaull@access.mountain.net (Roy Maull)
Date: Wed Aug 12 15:22:41 1998
AND, those two are NOT the only stations in West Virginia:-):-) 73.. Roy N8YYS Keep West Virginia beautiful.. Grow ALUMINUM!! -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00192.html (8,996 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed Aug 12 11:43:21 1998
Actually, I think Al probably QSLs the same folks over and over and over ... ;^} You sure can't tell from my incoming bureau traffic that he's taking up any of the slack; maybe he doesn't work too ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00193.html (8,471 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Wed Aug 12 11:51:25 1998
As long as we are talking about contesters in WVA, how often do you think DX stations change the default (04) of W8AH and N8YYS and other 8 stations in WVA to the correctly sent zone of 05? I bet the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00194.html (8,874 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: kh2d@kuentos.guam.net (Jim Kehler)
Date: Wed Aug 12 16:10:51 1998
Yeah, Fred. You're terrible. Go in the back room and whip yourself with a piece of RG-59.... That's what I like about this refractor, I learn something new every day. I didn't know there WERE any oth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00195.html (9,059 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (rfpwr@linknet.net)
Date: Wed Aug 12 16:02:08 1998
When I lived in WV (most of my life) DX stations I worked in CQWW would many times question me when I sent Zone 5. They wanted to place me in Zone 4. This was before computer logging. As a fairly ac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00202.html (9,712 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] QSL Bureau Fee Structure (score: 1)
Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman)
Date: Wed Aug 12 17:49:19 1998
I've heard it said by more than one person that, given the degree of automation provided to us today by computerized logging programs, it's easier to print labels for *everyone* and send them out, th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00212.html (9,357 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu