Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSLing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSLing\s*$/: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: f5vhj@wanadoo.fr (Al Crespo); Date: Tue Aug 5 15:33:51 2003; I just went through a stack of QSL's between 1-2 feet high , or half a meter, from various bureaus that I belong to. It took less then a day to finish them off. Prior to using labels and a computer,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00111.html (7,136 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: otterstad@enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad); Date: Wed Aug 6 11:26:54 2003; you have the right attitude, IMHO.' 73 Rag Otterstad LA5HE also JW5HE OZ8RO located in Telemark - home of skiing. My antenna "farm" can be found on HTTP://no.photos.yahoo.com/la5he when you click on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00129.html (7,249 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: ab0mv@ix.netcom.com (Merrimon Crawford Pladsen); Date: Wed Aug 6 19:17:04 2003; We have discussed this QSLing ad nauseum. Some people are considerate of others and some are not/are rude, self-centered jerks. This is true of contesters as much as anyone else. As far as I am conce; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00144.html (8,356 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com); Date: Thu Aug 7 00:11:41 2003; My cents' worth. Since I was listed in the original post as a "good guy" who QSLs, may I make a suggestion? On your QRZ.com listing, put whatever you want on your directions for QSLing. Mine says som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00149.html (7,376 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@quadnet.net (Bob Wanderer); Date: Thu Aug 7 22:20:57 2003; Interesting -- I e-mailed Nat for his list of those non-QSL'ers as he indicated he would provide in his posting. No response. 73, Bob AA0CY; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00167.html (6,584 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: nat@ajheatwole.com (Nat Heatwole); Date: Fri Aug 8 13:34:52 2003; Bob, Not to worry, you'll get your list. I received a ton of responses from my post, many of them off the reflector, and I'm still in the process of weeding through all of them. 73, Nat, WZ3AR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00186.html (6,934 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (Tom Baugh AE9B); Date: Fri May 4 05:42:19 2001; Merri.. I must agree. After the sweepstakes, I thought it would be neat to assemble all of the cards in the sweep and put together a collagge with them. After sending a SASE with a little note thanki; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00064.html (7,073 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: dcopeland@wwn.net (Dan Copeland); Date: Mon Feb 16 19:57:29 1998; I have to agree with Fred. I cannot belive the responses I have read on this reflector. 50 to 75 cards at .20 each comes to between $10 and $15. That is a small price to pay so the contesters with th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00151.html (8,450 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Tue Feb 17 05:20:04 1998; Well, since you mentioned 50 to 75 cards, I guess you were talking about me. My mega $$$$$$$$ station is a FT-840 and FL-2100B. All homebrew antennas and a 35 foot crankup I bought from a guy who had; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00161.html (7,895 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: kl7y@Alaska.NET (Dan Robbins); Date: Mon Feb 16 20:31:34 1998; While I admire K3ZO's QSL reply philosophy, I will continue to remain a cheapskate. I have replied to about 4000 cards per year on the average. Most from contests, about half of these are foreign. My; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00162.html (9,144 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: ricp@pop.ma.ultranet.com (Ric); Date: Tue Feb 17 15:52:44 1998; Hi Folks, While I read the posts here, I seldom post, although I often send directs where I can help folks with info. But I thought I'd put in my 2 cents worth on the QSLing issue. First, I love to r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00172.html (9,079 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: bdSmith@sftp.com (Brian Smith); Date: Tue Feb 17 12:26:22 1998; Let me put on my asbestos suit... I have just gotten started in Ham radio compared to some on this reflector (just a little more than a year), so I do not have the sage wisdom shown by some, but... B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00175.html (9,686 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue Feb 17 15:38:47 1998; Agreed on the money. Not much of an investment. I think most were complaining about the time, not the money. 73 Bill, W4AN -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00179.html (7,871 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: w3ab@qsl.net (George Badger); Date: Tue Feb 17 15:33:12 1998; Brian, I've been a licensed ham for more years than I can count on my fingers and toes and I still dig getting QSL cards. Not for awards but for the memories of the QSO's. And some are 5NN'ers. At my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00182.html (10,534 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: kl7y@Alaska.NET (Dan Robbins); Date: Tue Feb 17 18:44:37 1998; Here is a portion of an e-mail I recently sent. Maybe a view from this side will be informative: KL7Y: Consider this thought experiment: Suppose you were to handle my QSL chores. (I would still pay f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00185.html (11,153 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: jdowning@intelenet.net (John Downing); Date: Tue Feb 17 22:16:40 1998; Hi there boyz and gurls, How 'bout this: I'll just post my complete contest logs on a web page along with a blank card template. Just look up your QSO in the log, fill in the blanks, and print yourse; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00188.html (7,812 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed Feb 18 12:25:55 1998; I agree with both Fred and Ric - my domestic QSLing burden is < 1 percent of QSOs made, despite high activity in SSCW, in particular - and almost all send SASE's. But responding to DX bureau QSLs was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00191.html (9,423 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR98BrettGraham); Date: Thu Feb 19 09:24:22 1998; While I realize this started with domestic QSLs for statesiders, KL7Y's post really hits it on the head for those of us in the rest of the world when it comes to anything to do with QSLs. All of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00201.html (8,142 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: beaton@wintermute.co.uk (Alastair Beaton); Date: Thu Feb 19 10:03:18 1998; How about a voluntary code for QSLing, encouraging people to only send QSLs for "significant" contacts? Some contest stations (and others) practice "saturation bombing" - QSLing everyone they work. 9; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00253.html (8,283 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1): Author: ON7SS@mail.dma.be (Marc , ON7SS); Date: Tue Feb 24 18:25:48 1998; My program sends only one QSL on each band, each mode. It cannot be that difficult to put this other logprograms. Anybody of the program guru's thought of that yet. I wrote mine myself in dbase. 73 M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00270.html (8,358 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]