Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSLing\s*$/: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:23:57 +0000
Postage only went down for first class letters and large envelopes. That was due to Congress not extending the "temporary" exigency increase. It's going up next year 2c due to CPI. However, Priority
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00474.html (10,926 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 11:26:22 -0500
The DARC Community Log (DCL) is available to hams worldwide and used for all DARC and WRTC 2018 awards. You don't even have to download your log information for CQWW, CQ WPX, and DARC contests if you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00475.html (11,164 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 13:34:15 -0400
When I was much younger, (in the 1970's) I used to wait for the mailman to see my QSL cards come in and save my paper-route $$ to buy stamps so I could send return cards back out. Now from Canada, it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00478.html (9,961 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:11:01 +0000
My kick out of radio is the Radioman stuff, not the Yeoman (clerk) stuff. My QSL activity, living in a not-rare country/state/county, is quite manageable. An order of 1,000 QSL cards is a 10-year sup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00479.html (14,970 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:27:24 -0600
GM Guys I believe I am in the minority on this but I always say a few words on my outgoing QSL's. One thing I always write on QSL is " thanks for the QSO/QSL " for recieved cards. I believe some peop
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00480.html (13,500 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raymond <bob@wa1z.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:03:12 -0500
As I was fretting over the nearly 100 DL cards (mostly from WAG contest) in my most recent buro delivery, many from whom I've worked and QSLed many times, I came across a card from a young DL ham to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00482.html (8,804 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:27:48 -0500
$1.15/oz comes out to $920 for fifty pounds. A round trip airline trip NYC to Frankfort costs about $750. (Maybe less with judicious bargain shopping?) Might hauling overseas QSL cards become a new m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00483.html (10,472 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 14:47:54 -0600
Does anyone know how this overseas actually works? I mean more or less say a parcel costs one dollar to ship from USA, to the country of kabookistan. Now of that dollar,, does Kabookistan get any of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00487.html (11,671 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:25:55 +0000
That may well be true in your shack. (And that doesnt upset me) At my shack they have served the same purpose for 50-some years. They serve as a tangible token of a radio contact with a fellow in som
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00490.html (8,606 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Violette" <danki6x@socal.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 14:24:08 -0800
More like $13 for 100 sent via GlobalQsl (buro). Dan KI6X --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Hank Garretson Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00491.html (10,009 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 14:34:08 -0800
Not my experience. Just checked my most recent purchase. It was $106 for 1000 QSLs--printing (2-sided, photo), addressing, and distribution to buros. 73, Hank, W6SX __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00493.html (10,568 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Violette" <danki6x@socal.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:49:37 -0800
Hank, Agree. You originally said One-hundred cards take about forty-five minutes of my time. For something like $100, I see you meant one-thousand. That makes sense, just did not want the first quest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00496.html (11,894 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Violette" <danki6x@socal.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:31:18 -0800
Hate to continue this but postage in US actually went down early 2016 (Congress temporary cost for fuel or something actually expired and was not renewed!) and DX is now $1.15. Though it used to be c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00500.html (9,851 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 19:40:34 -0600
You want to see high prices? The post office is dirt cheap. Send a 8 pound box to say Italy via the post office. it will cost ya, $64 bucks But via UPS 270 bucks Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00000.html (8,146 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 09:15:38 -0500
But you get better service, surely....Not! I did, and I do, change my mind about purchasing something if the item is not delivered by the postal service. My 'awakening' happened after being charged m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00003.html (7,774 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 15:46:10 +0000
Already done although they don't make that much off the postage fees and still rely on generous donations. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00005.html (10,109 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Julio VE3FH via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:18:50 -0500
I do the very same thing, I always did and always will, I appreciate it every QSL card I receive... 73, Julio VE3FH making on I station. same It QSLing my guys just would every for possible. given ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00031.html (13,771 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Julio VE3FH via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:30:13 -0500
I fully agree with you Hans and it doesn't upset me either but what the LoTW cheerleaders don't seem to be able to comprehend is that their beloved online tool cannot replace cards for the simple rea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00032.html (9,395 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:44:36 -0500
Hi Julio, I was of the same opinion until recently, but after seeing the bureau return rate dwindle to around 5%, and the increase in postal costs, I changed my mind. LOTW and eQSL then added an inte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00033.html (7,976 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 08:01:16 -0500
Partial quote: " Since 2012, the RSGB has been a world leader in promoting responsible QSLing. It has encouraged Members to 'think before they send' and to use OQRS, Club Log and Logbook of The Worl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00034.html (7,999 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu