Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSO\s+Parties\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSO\s+Parties\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: utahfolk@konnections.com (utahfolk@konnections.com); Date: Tue May 4 08:18:04 1999; I don't want to start a thread here ... just toss out a couple of ideas and see if someone wiser than I can formulate a better contest .... Except for a few, these (State) QSO PARTIES ARE A WASTE OF; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00030.html (9,390 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Tue May 4 11:59:56 1999; << Except for a few, these (State) QSO PARTIES ARE A WASTE OF TIME! Alas, so true. Unless you are in the sate sponsoring the QSO party, it can be mighty boring. Last weekend I made a point of getting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00031.html (8,326 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com); Date: Tue May 4 13:07:36 1999; Aw, Dave, many of these can really be interesting and fun! I think more and more state groups are getting serious about making these work, by diligently working on getting most of their counties on t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00032.html (8,988 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: v31jp@logical123.net (v31jp@logical123.net); Date: Tue May 4 13:16:40 1999; In many cases, I agree with Dave. What would recommend to many of the QSO party organizers would be to combine your efforts into a multiunit QSO party. Something like the Utah/Delaware/RI/Ont QSO Par; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00033.html (9,314 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: k8cc@ix.netcom.com (David A. Pruett); Date: Tue May 4 14:56:05 1999; Speaking as someone who has not been much of a "state QSO partier" over the years, up until a month ago I would have probably agreed with you. However, after recently having taken over the sponsorshi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00035.html (9,585 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: k0hb@arrl.org (Hans - K0HB); Date: Tue May 4 14:32:45 1999; State QSO parties, while some of them have the trappings of a "contest", are more commonly just exactly what their name implies -- a party -- and a reason for a population with some affinity (in this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00036.html (9,110 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Tue May 4 14:27:48 1999; A few of the state QSO Parties are actually kind of big contests. In particular, I've seen some impressive QSO totals from the California QSO Party and the Texas QSO Party. The rest of the state QSO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00037.html (9,352 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] QSO parties (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Tue May 4 13:06:17 1999; While I disagree with Dave's proposal to modify QSO parties, I appreciate the discussion, as it may prove helpful to sponsors of less-popular QSO parties should they wish to increase participation. B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00038.html (9,547 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: KU8E@email.msn.com (Jeff Clarke); Date: Wed May 5 18:53:49 1999; Dave, I think one purpose the state qsos parties serve is for the guys who are county hunters. It is pretty common for guys in the state having the qso party to go mobile to hand out rare counties in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00040.html (11,038 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Tue May 4 18:49:06 1999; But, Dave, there is a QSO Party like that, but with only the operator's name and location in the exchange: North American QSO Party...AND it's only sponsored by one organization (not 50) AND it's onl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00041.html (11,681 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Tue May 4 20:13:39 1999; etc. Hey Dave, Are you bummed out that you aren't in Box Elder County and therefore can't be the hunted in the Box Elder County Utah QSO Party this weekend? ;-) (BTW, has everyone checked out those r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00042.html (10,249 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Qso Parties (score: 1): Author: k8wt@eatrf.com (Richard F. Brake); Date: Tue May 4 20:38:26 1999; Guys I think a state qso party, presents a great opportunity to bring a new ham or non hf ham into the world of hf contesting. When the state you live in has theirs, why not have a get together or as; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00043.html (9,930 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble); Date: Tue May 4 18:05:32 1999; fyi this weekend is also the Oregon qso pty.....was planning to show up but if no one knows about it I will setup for the CQ-M test as well!! bob w7gg Jefferson Cty, Oregon be live -- CQ-Contest on W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00044.html (9,688 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed May 5 01:16:25 1999; What would be fun is a East vs West QSO party. Split the U.S. somewhere, and have a duel. That would really generate some interest. 73 Tom W7WHY -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00045.html (8,550 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Tue May 4 22:37:59 1999; << I don't want to start a thread here >> Too late! As with any other endeavor, the state QSO Parties are as successful as the work the sponsors put into them. Aside from the CQP (which tempts partic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00046.html (17,222 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: nf1j@juno.com (nf1j@juno.com); Date: Tue May 4 10:30:01 1999; Well, last year, I operated portable from three different places in the CQP. I learned some important lessons that (in my mind) are probably pivotal for any state QSO party. 1: You need to be good *a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00047.html (10,397 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker); Date: Wed May 5 05:00:27 1999; But...but...there's another state in the Fifth call area! -- Ray WQ5L rocker@ametro.net -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00050.html (8,282 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: thompson@pcsoftintl.com (Randy Thompson); Date: Wed May 5 10:31:54 1999; No, ask the participants! I was fortunate to participate as a mobile in the Texas Armadillo Run and as a fixed station the year they tried to activate all USA counties. I count both of these in my h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00054.html (9,232 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: merchant@garlic.com (Stephen Merchant); Date: Fri May 7 17:11:10 1999; The Northern Calif. Contest Club has been sponsoring the California QSO Party since 1974 -- this fall's contest will mark the 25th CQP anniversary for NCCC. The club has worked long and hard to put C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00163.html (8,059 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: merchant@garlic.com (Stephen Merchant); Date: Fri May 7 17:11:10 1999; The Northern Calif. Contest Club has been sponsoring the California QSO Party since 1974 -- this fall's contest will mark the 25th CQP anniversary for NCCC. The club has worked long and hard to put C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00164.html (7,956 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]