Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSO\s+Party\s+Comment\s+Summary\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:19:05 -0400
Thank you to everyone who sent in comments, they were very good! 73 Scott W2LC W2LC@arrl.org QSO Party Comments & Suggestions Do not use CQP or PAQP weekend (I think thats a given) Fall is hunting se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00391.html (9,196 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:48:27 -0600
There already IS something like this - the MARAC CW and SSB contests: http://www.aa8r.net/ 73 - Jim AD1C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00392.html (7,108 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Eversole" <rick@eversoles.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
... The California QSO Party does allow CA stations to work other CA stations. We log them just like everyone else with the county QTH. The counties are however lumped as one "CA" mult when logged b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00394.html (7,926 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:04:52 -0700
county abbreviation list) Jim, AD1C, replied: Hmmm, I thought the NAQP (North American QSO Party) was really a coast-to-coast QSO party :^) 73. Rick, K6VVA * The Locust ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00400.html (7,915 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Hmmmm, NAQP with Mobile Categories?! You're on to something Rick! ;o) Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html Tennessee QSO Party http://www.tnqp.org/ Elecraft
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00402.html (9,535 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:59:48 -0500
IF the NAQP changed the exchange to County instead of State, I would agree. Even so, it's still a good contest in my book. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00403.html (8,954 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:28:29 +0000
Thanks all, for the last few comments. And the correction about CQP not using CA counties for multipliers for in-state CA stations. With the high activity of that contest it makes sense. Gives those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00404.html (8,303 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Comment Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <wb2abd@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:39 -0400
<< Hmmm, I thought the NAQP (North American QSO Party) was really a coast-to-coast QSO party :^) 73. Rick, K6VVA * The Locust >> But it doesn't have 3,077 multipliers ( umm, counties/parishes/distric
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00408.html (8,021 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu