- 1. [CQ-Contest] QST AND CQ SUBSCRITIONS (score: 1)
- Author: kz5qdx@COMMUNIQUE.NET (Douglas Bradford)
- Date: Thu Jan 29 17:02:03 1998
- I wonder how many would be subscribing to QST if it was not part of your dues. I think the only exception is if you are blind. As life member it is already paid for you just got to live long enough t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00595.html (7,201 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] QST AND CQ SUBSCRITIONS (score: 1)
- Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
- Date: Thu Jan 29 17:12:29 1998
- I signed up for the ARRL life membership around 1980 or so when it was still 20 years at $12/year. Back then I paid the $240 strictly to get the magazine, and I didn't care about any of the other st
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00600.html (7,396 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] QST AND CQ SUBSCRITIONS (score: 1)
- Author: miltj@aepnet.com (Milt Jensen, N5IA)
- Date: Thu Jan 29 20:53:31 1998
- WAYNE IS STILL GOING STRONG. I BOUGHT THE LIFE TIME SUBSCRIPTION TO 73, AS WELL AS THE ARRL LIFE MEMBERSHIP, IN THE LATE '60s. BOTH HAVE BEEN GOOD INVESTMENTS FOR ME. I SUBSCRIBED TO HAM RADIO AS LON
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00603.html (7,341 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu