Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSY\s+etiquette\s+$NAQP$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSY\s+etiquette\s+$NAQP$\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:55:08 -0400; I was fooling around back in NAQP CW. Working 40M, N2MM asked me to QSY to 15M. OK. I moved up to the specified freq but I did not know the etiquette: who calls whom. I guessed that since I was the a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00243.html (7,303 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:13:26 -0600; I would say that the asker (N2MM) should have called you on 15 meters. A related question, which isn't as clear is "how should N2MM call you" ? Should he specifically call you (i.e. K3KU de N2MM), or; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00246.html (8,209 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:37:21 -0700; When I move I tune quickly to see if the guy is already there so I can answer him. Failing that, calling CQ seems like a productive thing to do. I want to be doing something that helps my score and I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00247.html (8,693 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:15:46 -0500; Hi Art. Great question. I always assumed the "asker" would either call CQ on the QSY freq, or would call the "askee." For me, I always call the "askee," but my friend and local competitor K5PI always; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00249.html (8,417 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:56:28 -0500; Art, If you qsy and hear him transmitting, work him. If you qsy and don't hear him transmitting, call *him*. If he does not answer, it would be nice to go back to the original frequency and let him k; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00250.html (8,810 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT); I'd agree with you Dick... calling CQ is worth the effort, you never know who was listening and following and you're there anyway... go for it, you could open a whole new front ;o) 73, Julius Julius; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00252.html (10,642 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:05:17 -0500; I can think of several reasons that the requestor should call, and should probably CQ. That's what I do. First, if the requestor is a M/2, they will almost certainly already be calling CQ on the targ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00253.html (9,901 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:44:41 -0400; All of these answers sound great. So much of this answer is dependent upon your specific station setup and contest strategy that it's very hard to give an answer. Here's my HO on what to think about; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00254.html (14,138 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:09:08 -0400; Robert K5PI wrote: "I find that it often takes a couple of minutes for someone to QSY, presumably because their station isn't as automated as mine." Very good presumption! Now if all y'all "more auto; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00260.html (8,068 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:03:17 -0700 (PDT); One thing is missing from all of these... Which contest are you in?? Your approach most likely will depend on the contest, a state QSO Party would be different than SS and CQ WW DX would be different; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00261.html (16,988 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY etiquette (NAQP) (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:22:08 -0400 (EDT); _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00267.html (17,809 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]