Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Qsl\s+Practices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Qsl\s+Practices\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:41:27 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I guess it is time to come out of the closet on this. I personally, have a hard (check that), impossible time keeping up with the QSL requests for contest Qs through the Bureau. I have not answered Q; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00107.html (8,206 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Qsl Practices (score: 1): Author: "Carol Richards" <n2mm@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:16:08 -0500; As a practical method, I have become very selective to which ones I will qsl back ......specifically all qsl requests for 160m, 80m, 40m, and the warc bands and special requests for state, county, qr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00115.html (7,896 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Qsl Practices (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:57:35 -00; Me too. Me too. Same here. I'm very selective also. I only send QSL's to those who sent me one, but I might lapse if P5 comes on the air, or a pretty girl in California, or anyone with the name Hans; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00139.html (8,431 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices (score: 1): Author: Sherman Banks <w4atl@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:01:03 -0500; I QSL 100%. I import all of my contest QSOs into DXBase. When a card comes in I mark it as confirmed and if it has PSE QSL I hit the button for a label. About once per month I print out the labels, s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00143.html (7,397 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:53:05 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And that is part of the problem. Some stations just crank out QSLs by the gross whether they need a confirmation or not. Many times; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00146.html (7,905 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices (score: 1): Author: "Paul T. Antos" <wb2abd@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:11:59 -0500; As Bill W6WRT mentions, some stations do QSL ad nauseam. Burro cards with no "pse" on them I don't bother to answer. However, I have received multiple requests for the same contact because they never; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00149.html (8,029 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:51:36 -0600; I think that QSLing is a pain but... I remember when I was getting started I personally checked the mail everyday for cards. I just loved to get the cards. It is real hard to not QSL to everyone that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00178.html (10,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]