Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Question\s+about\s+CQ\s+WPX\s+\-\s+Tribander\/wires\s+category\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Question about CQ WPX - Tribander/wires category (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:32:14 -0400
I have a full size 3 element, 20 metre yagi, which I inherited from a silent Key for the effort of taking it down, along with a windmill tower and very heavy radar rotor. If I were to put it up somep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00058.html (8,410 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about CQ WPX - Tribander/wires category (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:28:01 -0400
It is important to remember that it is not really triband wires, but tribander SINGLE ELEMENT. I think (my opinion) that it was a huge mistake to nickname it TB Wires because a lot of efficient anten
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00061.html (10,795 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about CQ WPX - Tribander/wires category (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 21:52:42 -0400
Not if you used it. Not any more than using a Cushcraft MA5B would. No. It's not Tribander-Wires, it is Tribander and Single Element Antennas. If you actually had a Rhombic to use on 40, 80 and 160m,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00065.html (10,022 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about CQ WPX - Tribander/wires category (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:08:14 -0400
Thanks Ryan: Your information is well worthwhile. I'm still not sure whether my preferred, most simple, construction project would qualify. That would be one antenna, a full wave 80 metre loop, proba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00067.html (9,488 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about CQ WPX - Tribander/wires category (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:16:16 -0400
Yes. It would. The antenna has one element (heck, it has one wire), and you are foregoing the tribander entirely. TS with no T. The rules say nothing about the gain of the antenna. Only the number of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00068.html (9,392 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about CQ WPX - Tribander/wires category (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:33:00 -0500
I'm not sure about the rules regarding a loop antenna but I have a full-wave vertical loop I've been using on 40 meters for years. My friend Steve K9AN put up one for 80 meters once. He has a bigger
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00071.html (9,061 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu