Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Question\s+re\s+CQWW\s+UBN\s+point\s+deductions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Question\s+re\s+CQWW\s+UBN\s+point\s+deductions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Question re CQWW UBN point deductions (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Sun Aug 10 18:48:40 2003; Question re UBN point reductions for the knowing... I had one busted (-B) and one NIL (-N) QSO for stateside stations (they called me. Go figure...) It appears that I lost 12 points for each of them.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00195.html (7,146 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Question re CQWW UBN point deductions (score: 1): Author: k3lr@k3lr.com (Tim Duffy K3LR); Date: Sun Aug 10 18:47:17 2003; Barry: I am certain that this is not the case. Penalty points are assessed according to the value of the QSO that is lost. So zero point qsos that are Bad or NIL result in zero points for the penalty; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00202.html (8,301 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Question re CQWW UBN point deductions (score: 1): Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett); Date: Sun Aug 10 22:19:59 2003; Barry, This is how we handle the ARRL 10M and 160M contests. (ARRL 160 has W/VE = 2, DX = 5 and ARRL 10 has CW = 4 and SSB = 2). Penalties are ONE EQUIVALENT QSO. I would have expected the CQWW team; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00204.html (7,279 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Question re CQWW UBN point deductions (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Mon Aug 11 13:17:18 2003; Tim, I reviewed Barry's UBN and his interpretation was incorrect. The value of the QSO is removed as well as the penalty. So, the total amount removed from your final score - per qso is figured this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00212.html (10,714 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]