Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+R\:\s+WAE\s+PHONE\s+CONTEST\s+FREQ\,\s+To\s+be\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+be\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: "Matt IZ3EYZ - Matteo Marzilli" <iz3eyz@virgilio.it>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:53:48 +0200
Sam, it would be wise if you first check the examples you publish for your theories the next time. If you work YV4YC on 7127 @04.10z and HC2AO on 7106 @04.20z and get QTCs from them on the same QRG,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00020.html (13,428 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: "Lyubomir Slavov, OR2F" <on8lds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:43:34 +0200
Hello Sam, there is a non-written rule, we should never expect to meet so clear as it is pronounced : *"WORK FIRST - WORRY LATER !"* So, in accordance with the contest rules, you shouldn't run CQ in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00028.html (16,230 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:14:16 +0300
Leo, The interpretation you make is by no means logical and relevant for contesting. A RUN activity in non-allowed segments is not more violation of the rules than single contacts in the same segment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00033.html (19,064 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: Helmut Mueller <helmut@photo42.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:03:42 +0200 (CEST)
Dear friends. This discussion is absolutely useless. The rules say and MEAN do not use these areas. Full stop! If yo do so you are in danger of penalties or DQs. Last year we did not investigate this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00037.html (18,374 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:27:43 +0300
Well, discussion is surely not useless if there is a rule that creates confusion and that the organizers have not been enforcing. We would surely welcome a clear statement by the organizers that as a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00038.html (20,066 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:53:14 +0300
Congrats Tonno, I will be in contest anyway, and will not work in these segments. And will spot every station with comment - "DQ-rules violation". If somebody will work there and win over me (win? ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00039.html (20,713 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu