Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RBN\s+and\s+CQWW\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Update\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:28:58 -0500
Wow, quite a flap. Our little RBN group has no desire to be singled out. VE7CC does indeed run a Skimmer-enabled node - IIRC you can set/skimmer there and get both Skimmer and regular DXcluster spots
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00427.html (17,465 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:51:06 +0000
I think the 'public' requirement is going to open another can of worms. What constitutes 'public'? if a skimmer is available to members of only one club is that 'public'? If it's open to 2 stations?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00429.html (20,439 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:07:56 -0500
Regarding Dave's concern about the use of "public", it seems to me that's moot, since Skimmer spots are available only by Telnet and Telnet is by definition "public." All this says is that you can't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00433.html (20,094 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:45:42 +0000
This whole thread is both laughable and pathetic. It has nothing to do with amateur radio contesting, and everything to do with hybrid communications contesting - and that's not amateur radio. The co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00435.html (10,657 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:00:01 -0600
Dave, What "private" means *in this context* is not subject to debate. It means anything deployed outside the 500m circle for the benefit of one station only. Assuming that whatever you are doing is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00437.html (21,967 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:13:05 +0000
So if I set up a skimmer at someone else's station it is by definition 'public' since more than just me knows about it... that's nice. FYI the rules also do not specify 'private' in any way. My point
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00439.html (24,621 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:24:25 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Too much verbage and junk to process or interpret.....and my attorney is on holiday. Suddenly SOAB UNassisted sounds almost trivial! 73, Mike K9NW _______________________________________________ CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00456.html (6,883 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN and CQWW was: Re: CQ WW Update (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:54:27 -0500
Dave, I just want you and everyone else to know that the RBN will be up well before the contest starts, and we think it will be much better than ever before. We have just added a dedicated server (th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00476.html (25,772 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu