Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RDXC\s+Entry\s+Reclassified\s+to\s+High\s+Power\s*$/: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 05:17:14 +0000
At the end of an extraordinary seven week episode, owing as little to the pursuit of truth and justice as Kafkas The Trial, my SOAB Mixed LP submission to the Russian DX Contest 2016 has been confirm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00000.html (12,313 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 07:27:32 -0600
Wait........are you saying the person that is deciding this matter is the owner of the station you beat (P33W) or is heavily involved with this contest and how it is run? W0MU I am told similar recla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00001.html (13,665 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 14:23:53 +0000
owner of the station you beat (P33W) or is heavily involved with this contest and how it is run? I did not beat P33W. I entered SOAB Mixed LP whereas P33W entered SOAB Mixed HP. RA3AUU told me he is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00002.html (8,374 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 11:40:07 -0600
Obvious conflict of interest regardless. RA3AUU has no place discussing this matter with anyone. It would appear that he does not like a LP score to beat his HP station score. Was he the OP? The sten
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00005.html (10,049 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
- - I am most disappointed to learn here of this Saga. Most certainly anyone who knows Bob, either inside or outside this hobby. know him to be a person of the highest integrity and it is unthinkable
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00007.html (10,251 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Ranko Boca <4o3a@t-com.me>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 22:56:25 +0200
In EU5 region we have also reclassification of LZ8E from LP to HP? He is a serious qyalifier for WRTC. Q to comittee: 1.Why do you reclassify him, not another top LP station with almost simillar sco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00008.html (11,011 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 09:51:37 +0100
Dear Bob, In the data analysis world, we have a well known proverb, "If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything". Bob,I'm sorry to hear what you've had to endure for the last se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00010.html (16,317 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 09:03:43 -0600
Using RBN to attempt to prove a power violation alone is absurd. We already know that the antennas are different. 4 Square vs Mono Pole Vertical 80m What feed lines are being used? How old are the fe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00013.html (10,680 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Mark n2qt <n2qt.va@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 09:02:16 -0700
Also be aware that the skimmers (although statistically very good) will confuse a caller and the running station when reporting SNR. This means that the signal level of a station local to the skimmer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00014.html (18,143 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 19:25:53 +0000 (UTC)
That is most unlikely to happen Ranko.. Obviously the perception of those RDXC guys is that everybody cheats and ;"it is our ball, our game and we call the shots" This contest should be removed from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00016.html (12,718 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:06:41 -0500
On 10/2/2016 11:02, Mark n2qt wrote: Also be aware that the skimmers (although statistically very good) will confuse a caller and the running station when reporting SNR. This means that the signal le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00019.html (8,973 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 04:59:25 +0000
My thanks to all who have responded both here and by direct mail, I appreciate your support. If I have failed to acknowledge anyone directly, please accept my apologies but a number of other matters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00044.html (10,593 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 11:16:12 -0400
Just filling in one bit of info - the RBN-based "evidence" received from the RDXC did not compare signal reports among multiple RBN nodes, which would have been meaningless for all the reasons Mike e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00056.html (12,681 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: "Juan EA5RS" <ea5rs@ono.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 00:48:59 +0200
Ionospheric skywave signal amplitude or strength is a time-varying random variable with a mean and a standard deviation. Difference between strengths of two signals is also a random variable with an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00058.html (14,537 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:31:35 -0600
The silence from the RDXC folks is deafening. Not that I ever operated it seriously, but unless they come forward and explain their position reasonably I think they may find that participation may dr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00062.html (14,935 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:59:29 +0000
On 15th September, the day following release of the preliminary results of RDXC I wrote the following note to the adjudicators: Quote: In your preliminary results P3F entry in RDXC 2016 is listed in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00066.html (9,947 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:30:52 -0500
Perhaps you may get more response if you post on the Russian contest reflector (it is quite active). Or better yet, write to the RDXC Committee directly. Contest sponsors are not obligated to monitor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00068.html (18,427 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:39:43 -0400
I basically gave up on Russia DX when I had my score knocked down because I supposedly worked stations that were "not in the contest". Not in the contest? WTF. I worked them; LoTW confirms I worked t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00069.html (17,042 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:51:50 +0500
I am not going to be on any side of the argument. But we all know that power cheating exists and proliferates. It has become especially acute after the introduction of the new WRTC selection rules wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00071.html (10,916 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: W8FJ via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:30:43 -0400
I have been following this thread for awhile now. There certainly appears to be some shady things going on here. Perhaps there should be an organized effort to boycott next years RDXC event. John, W8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00072.html (11,554 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu