Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RDXC\s+updated\s+FAQ\s+\-\s+Remote\s+operation\s*$/: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:56:55 -0700
It's their contest, their rules. You can still operate, and submit a check log. It will be no less fun. 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7 Hello all, It seems that the opinions of Paul EI5DI and the Russian DX Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00022.html (9,126 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:31:03 -0600
Just because it shows up as a packet spot doesn't mean you're going to work it. I never worked Ed when he was in P5. I never worked Chuck Brady or the other op (Petrus?) when they were on Bouvet. I a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00025.html (11,056 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:55:43 -0600
Maybe those who wish to destroy the hobby should certainly move along. Doug --Original Message-- Maybe those that no longer get enjoyment out of the hobby should move along. I happen to think it is j
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00026.html (11,870 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:37:59 -0500
This just about *has* to be a translation problem. I can sympathize with the RDXC organizers taking every step to ban the use of remote receivers (remote from the transmitter). However, the Russians
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00027.html (9,828 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@hughes.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:37:35 -0500
Pete - Don't assume cq-contest is the center of the universe. The RDXC guys, as those who run other contests, don't all spend a lot of time monitoring reflectors, even this one. Questions about conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00029.html (11,229 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Doug, Following your train of thought, one could easily conclude that the ARRL is out to destroy the hobby by "dumbing down" the requirements for DXCC. If that's the case then you would send them a s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00030.html (10,027 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:54:49 +0000
This attitude is typical of those, whether individuals or organisations, who believe that they, alone, are the custodians of truth and the paragons of reason. They simply cannot imagine that anyone c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00031.html (10,888 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:27:48 -0600
When you carefully look at the current rule 9, it also penalizes people who move. As an example suppose one lived near the border of an European country, and moved across the border into the neighbou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00032.html (13,337 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:35:20 -0500
Tom, I'm quite aware of cq-contest's less than universal readership, but still think that organizers of a major contest like RDXC would have someone watching for controversies of the sort this has ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00033.html (12,286 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:51:46 -0500
Gee, Paul, what's that old saying about pots and kettles? I have, indeed, been corresponding with Mats, as well as with another Russian friend, and I think we are all in agreement that there appears
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00034.html (12,408 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:08:31 +0100
In my personal opinion yes that's fair. Next, since it is a different country with a different administration and possible hamradio rules, you need to get a new different callsign anyway. I do not un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00035.html (9,210 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:22:36 +0000
<snip> I have - several times. And without reply, other than in terms of "this is ridiculously over the top and wishful thinking". http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2011-February/09366
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00036.html (11,128 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:14:58 -0700
When I first read Paul's post I honestly thought it was from someone else to him since it seemed to fit like a glove. Pots and kettles indeed ... 73, Dave AB7E _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00037.html (13,819 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu