Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RE\:\s+QSO\s+B4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RE\:\s+QSO\s+B4\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL <kr2q@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 18:14:16 -0400; Over the years (decades) I've found that "just tune on by" works for me. If they don't sign in 2 calls...I'm gone. What happens if you call a "non-signer" and work him and he still does not sign his; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00016.html (8,728 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Horton" <k5iid@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 02:50:32 -00; Hi Doug, Being a 99.9% search and pounce contester, I really know where of you speak. I have tried and in some cases am still trying to "walk on by" these guys. I think your 2 Qs is a good rule of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00018.html (10,372 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 03 Sep 2003 23:31:51 -0500; Will probably regret prolonging this debate but... Since when are you locked to that frequency? If he doesn't sign, I log *nothing* - I scratch the QSO and go elsewhere. [0] As Barry says, if he was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00027.html (8,490 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:01:41 EDT; Never having been DX in a contest I can only speak from the USA side. If the guy doesn't give his call by the second QSO I work him and ask him. I get several different responses. The first is just h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00029.html (8,372 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Schulz Jonathan <jonathan.schulz@siemens.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:12:51 -0500; Mike Gilmer [mailto:n2mg@peoplepc.com] wrote: <snip> pretty rare? darn near impossible for any length of time - this would have both of the DX stations transmitting and listening on the same frequen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00034.html (8,496 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Re: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:12:57 -0400 (EDT); No arguement of the IDing thread but here's an additional possibility if you are listening in on the DX station: 2 mins with no ID DX: QRZ ME: N1UR DX: N1UR 5933 ME: 5905 DX: QRZ And your thinking, h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00039.html (8,134 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Re: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "Kenny K2KW" <K2KW@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:17:29 -0500; When I sense the timing is not right - i.e. their response is a bit too late, or early, I purposely only send a partial call. If the station doesn't correct you, it's pretty certain he was calling s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00040.html (8,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]