Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+and\s+CW\s+Sprints\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:31:39 -0800
It has been two years since we had this conflict (thanks to Valentine's day falling on the Sprint last year). Here is what I posted about the problem then - and I feel exactly the same way today. htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00115.html (8,601 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:34:39 -0500
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00086.html Unfortunately, since you posted the suggestion that FOC Marathon and CQ/RJ WPX RTTY be scheduled for the same weekend, the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00119.html (9,492 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:20:42 -0500
Before we get too far into suggesting frequencies above 7100 for what is essentially a full power 1.5 KW contest for the winners, at least, we need to remember that, if I am not mistaken, we are all
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00123.html (8,436 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:35:36 -0500
Since the start of 2005 there has been a RTTY contest just about every weekend, with more to come in the following weeks. Are you guys going to just claim every weekend for yourselves. My post was in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00135.html (9,419 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:29:54 EST
Since the start of 2005 there has been a RTTY contest just about every weekend, with more to come in the following weeks. Are you guys going to just claim every weekend for yourselves. Jeff, I guess
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00139.html (8,788 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:50:38 -0800
KU8E said: Since the start of 2005 there has been a RTTY contest just about every weekend, with more to come in the following weeks. Are you guys going to just > claim every weekend for yourselves. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00141.html (8,925 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:57:00 -0800
Oh really? I'd suggest you set up a RTTY station and do a SO2R in the RTTY Sprint and see how you do against some of the "lower class" RTTY ops. There's one coming up on the13th of March. I am glad I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00142.html (8,892 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:28:29 -0500
Jeff, Before you go casting stones, go look at any of the Contest Calendars and tell me one weekend this year that has not had a CW contest of some kind. By the way, your own posting shows at least f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00143.html (10,517 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:42:28 -0800
Joe, K4IK wrote: == No, it is the sponsors of a NORTH AMERICAN contest who chose to move it into conflict with an INTERNATIONAL RTTY contest. The solution is to return CW Sprint to the first weekend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00144.html (9,129 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mike.tessmer@hillmangroup.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:48:03 -0500
emergency communications and how we are some of the best equipped operators to handle such communications because we are accustomed to exchanging information under often less than ideal conditions.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00145.html (8,848 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:21:20 -0700
The only hope for tonight's Sprint is for the cw guys to utilize the extra band. Last night WD0J was cq'ing like mad on 7027 RTTY. He had a low QSO number, and was working only about 20 Q's per hour,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00151.html (8,616 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:33:03 -0500
Once again demonstrating our adaptability, during the Sporint last night people gradually moved down the 40M band till you could find sprinters all the way down to 7004. 73, Pete N4ZR At 09:48 AM 2/1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00156.html (9,552 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Younker" <SunGodX@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:30:40 -0800
-- Original Message -- From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com> To: <mike.tessmer@hillmangroup.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 7:33 AM Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00165.html (10,033 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu