Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RX\s+Heresy\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RX\s+Heresy\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:46:14 -0500; I have watched with some amazement as the Elecraft K3 has seemingly taken over the top dog's spot among contest radios, both among the top ops and the rest of us. This impels me to wonder, though - h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00367.html (7,717 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:15:14 -0600; In the old days (late 70's) I remember the old Drake B line was the contesters choice because it beat anything else that was out there for strong signal rejection. It even beat it's next generation C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00372.html (9,191 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:10:39 +0000; Well I certainly can't speak for top ten contesters, but I will say that using the K3's at W0ZT's has been an interesting experience. For example, 160 meters on major contest weekends has all these e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00373.html (9,699 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: W8FJ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:27:44 EST; Pete.. I feel that the radio has helped me make weak signal QSOs that I might have otherwise missed, but even if it hasn't gained me a single extra QSO, it's gone a long way towards reducing the stre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00378.html (8,469 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: "MM0BQI" <MM0BQI@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:51:13 -0800; Great question Pete, I thought I would offer my experience as a 'cannon fodder' part time contester. (100w to some low wires in the centre of Edinburgh). I had my Mk5 (With Inrad's) and K3 side by si; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00379.html (10,131 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:38:50 -0500; K5RC wrote something addressing this in NCJ at some point in the relatively recent past. I don't recall the details exactly, but the title was something like "The Next 3db." The thesis of the article; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00380.html (10,860 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: mike l dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:05:44 -0800; it is all a matter of reference. when K7LAY or W7LNG are on the receiver is silent, and i just wait, when no local is on the receiver works find and i can hear most weak signals mike w7dra who will b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00382.html (8,672 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:29:32 -0500; Hi Pete Good question. While I am not a top 10 guy, I will offer these observations. I have a FT-1000 MP with Inrad filter and a K3 and am a SO2R wannbe type guy. Been doing SO2R for a year or two, b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00386.html (11,151 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: pa5mw@home.nl; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:06:41 +0100; Hi Pete, Our club station has moved from back end to sub top-ten position this year. Since that is also due to some hardware changes I'd like to share our experiences during these last few years. Har; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00387.html (12,546 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:02:44 -0500; Pete et al...if you search the 3830 Soapbox archives for _K3_, _K3s_ or _K3's_, I believe you'll find some answers. The most interesting thing to me is how slowly or quickly some big gun stations are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00389.html (8,114 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:30:17 -0800; I have been using a K3 now since the IARU contest in 2007. I sent it back into the shop just before the ARRL DX CW contest to get the beta hardware upgraded to production and ended up operating the A; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00395.html (9,957 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:51:26 -0800; Put me in the category of people who thought that a radio just couldn't make that much difference. After all, I was working people and making good scores. Sure, there would be times I would have trou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00403.html (12,096 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:37:46 +0100; K5ZD wrote yet another K3 "made in USA" hype: No pops or beeps or phantom signals. There are laws of physics governing electrical signals mixing and Collins interpreted them in 1970's on noisy HF wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00019.html (8,274 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]