Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\.\s+TO7A\s+Debacle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\.\s+TO7A\s+Debacle\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:50:48 -0700; Yes, but you were a boy and your Dad was doing what Dad's do to raise you. Dim is NOT a boy, he's a grown man, and by now should know right from wrong. No need to hunt him down like an animal, but th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00393.html (9,925 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 20:26:12 -0400; To be clear on the rules, CQWW 2014 contests were NOT "WRTC2018 qualifying events" so no penalty automatically applies to those disqualified for the 2014 CQWW contests. CQWW 2015 & 2016 contests ARE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00394.html (11,634 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:20:15 +0300; Brian, Have no doubts that I see this violation as very serious, and very intentional. I also agree that the possibility to "return to other CQ events" already in 2015 seems non logical. Atletes who; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00396.html (34,924 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:00:30 -0500; Personally, My thought for a penalty was just similar to Brady the football player. He got the 4 game no play. I'm not advocating a can't play next year in the contest. BUT a probationary category. W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00397.html (13,733 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:13:01 -0600; We don't really know what the committee found in his log. Maybe they were giving him a warning shot across the bow or maybe they didn't find all the padded fictitious contacts. If it were me, I would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00404.html (35,686 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 12:58:37 -0700 (PDT); Poor analogy. Brady didn't get DQ'd. He keeps the win, and the Championship. Dit dit, De Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00405.html (14,024 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 16:59:27 -0400; I for one am looking forward to the day when we'll stop consuming reflector bandwidth beating this dead horse. Yes, he cheated, the CQWW Committee caught it (kudos to them) and levied an appropriate; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00418.html (10,438 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 06:39:32 -0700; Attitudes such as yours are how we got to this point in the first place. People have been publicly ignoring bad behaviors for decades, and there are still folks who privately claim certain knowledge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00426.html (11,582 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]