Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\#\s+of\s+elevated\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\#\s+of\s+elevated\s+radials\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Re: # of elevated radials (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Apr 24 00:36:00 1997; Hi Jan, I bet you do know this signal well enough - not under this callsign but under a bunch of others like : K1AR........... but I do agree with you it is on of big gun W1's on 80m - there is no si; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00262.html (8,647 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Re: # of elevated radials (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Apr 24 22:49:58 1997; No I do say they are about the same, no significant difference, more depends on the propagation, in a moment K1AR might be #1, 15 minutes later W3LPL and another 10 minutes later someone else. 73 ! J; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00269.html (7,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]