Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+April\s+WPX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+April\s+WPX\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: April WPX (score: 1): Author: k8cc@ix.netcom.com (David A. Pruett); Date: Sat May 8 17:00:28 1999; I would like to add my vote to KL7RA's for moving WPX CW to April. While I have genuine respect for my FLQP cohorts and hate to see anything impose on what they've accomplished, WPX CW is a major, wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00152.html (7,320 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: April WPX (score: 1): Author: k0xq@amsat.org (Sean Warner K0XQ); Date: Sun May 9 20:22:15 1999; Well, if anyone is keeping a tally, here's a vote to keep WPX where it is. Some of us rather like it being on a holiday weekend, eliminates the need to either take Monday off or walk around at work; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00171.html (7,489 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: April WPX (score: 1): Author: n5nj@att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Sun May 9 21:14:24 1999; I must add my support for the idea to move CW WPX also. Had it been a few weeks ago, I would have operated it seriously. As it falls on Memorial Day weekend, I will not. Robert E. Naumann N5NJ / V260; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00172.html (8,194 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: April WPX (score: 1): Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker); Date: Sun May 9 23:22:14 1999; I on Maybe it's a location thing, but I *like* summertime propagation. Yes, 10 meters is flat, and summer is not the time of year for 80 or 160 meters. On the other hand, 20 meters is so much more fu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00180.html (7,219 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]