Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+RTTY\s+SPOT\s+REPORT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+RTTY\s+SPOT\s+REPORT\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW RTTY SPOT REPORT (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:39:03 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Thanks David for exposing these bozos for what they are.....cheaters. Unfortunately, the problem won't go away, despite your noble efforts, until someone from the ARRL or CQWW can answer the question; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00058.html (7,763 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW RTTY SPOT REPORT (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 12:41:43 -0400; I know some people have received warning letters from ARRL. That usually does it - they don't repeat. I believe the problems did not come from competitive (top in state/section) stations. -- Tom == e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00059.html (8,121 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]