Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Consider\s+this\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider this (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mts.net (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Apr 24 08:42:41 2002
First off, let me state I do not run SO2R, so this is not about protecting any turf. I don't believe SO2R warrants a separate category. W7ZR's analysis -- so statistically flawed on so many levels I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00338.html (10,299 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider This (score: 1)
Author: w9wi@w9wi.com (Doug Smith W9WI)
Date: Thu Apr 25 12:49:14 2002
*Something* has affected frequency occupation. It's most blatantly obvious on 10 meters during CW and mixed-mode contests, when you have people CQing as high as 28.250. Before SO2R, it was rare (at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00387.html (8,786 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider this (score: 1)
Author: w7zr@citlink.net (Richard Zalewski)
Date: Thu Apr 25 16:10:07 2002
Good, I accomplished what I started out to do and that is to get people to think about this subject (SO2R). While I do not want to get embroiled in attacks and a lot of specifics I will try to make a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00402.html (10,479 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider this (score: 1)
Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones)
Date: Thu Apr 25 21:04:23 2002
people to Truly, I'd have to respond that you did not attain your goal. What you did was to reopen a stale topic and give a few of us a chance to get in some zingers. The vast majority of respondents
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00407.html (14,162 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider this (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: Fri Apr 26 05:14:20 2002
Who ever said this? Why does the analogy of packet use and SO2R keep coming up? I see absolutely no connection (other than the attempts by those who don't use them to want to separate themselves from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00409.html (8,403 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider this (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Sat Apr 27 03:09:23 2002
And the problems with this is???? Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00422.html (7,535 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Re: Consider this (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins)
Date: Sat Apr 27 12:09:28 2002
no problem, which is the point of the question. So2r is ONE OPERATOR doing all he can to win. Using packet takes assistance from other operators which used to put you in a multi op class. The s/o 'a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00426.html (8,190 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu