Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+DX\s+\&\s+Contesting\s+Forums\s+Outrage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+DX\s+\&\s+Contesting\s+Forums\s+Outrage\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: DX & Contesting Forums Outrage (score: 1): Author: n6jm@pacbell.net (n6jm@pacbell.net); Date: Sun Apr 19 16:39:15 1998; Mike W8DN says in part: and Bob W2CE replies in part with: to create questions for many in the future.... I think they are trying to tell us they are not interested in contesters or DXers. Just run t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00329.html (9,294 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: DX & Contesting Forums Outrage (score: 1): Author: ww5l@gte.net (Tom Anderson); Date: Mon Apr 20 08:56:01 1998; Mike, Bob, et.al. A similar thing happened to us a couple years ago at Ham-Com in Arlington, Texas in June. It seems the convention management got tired of DXers, even though we had as many as 400 at; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00338.html (10,747 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]