- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Jordan K4QPL" <k4qpl@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:22:46 -0500
- Thanks for including me in the post, John. I've also read Ken's response. I probably need to think about it some more to give a more reasoned response, but my "gut reaction" is that NAQP, particularl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00368.html (15,155 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Jordan K4QPL" <k4qpl@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:26:35 -0500
- Further to my last post, my thoughts were faster than my fingers. I meant to say, "Including DX at high power might discourage....." Jim, K4QPL -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00369.html (13,337 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
- Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:01:13 -0500
- It seems to me that the answer to my college roommate's (K4QPL's) concerns is that DX stations are already included. I was just trying to encourage their participation, thinking from the point of vie
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00374.html (9,936 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu