Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+LAX\s+is\s+not\s+LA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+LAX\s+is\s+not\s+LA\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1): Author: jmellis@ihug.co.nz (Martin Ellis); Date: Sun Apr 25 18:54:32 1999; Hmmm... Actually in the ARRL DX we believe that LA is Louisiana (or ask the US Post Office). Martin ZL1ANJ -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00231.html (7,119 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1): Author: W2CE@prodigy.net (W2CE); Date: Sun Apr 25 08:39:48 1999; Maybe we need to develope and spread a new set of abbreviations in the cases of onflicting ones. LAX - LA SD -SDG are certainly at the top of the error list. Why couldn't Los Angeles be LOS ? Are th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00233.html (7,662 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1): Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell); Date: Sun Apr 25 12:05:52 1999; I don't believe that we need to develop a NEW set of abbreviations. There are ARRL standard abbreviations and YES they are available on the web site. They also used to be published on the official fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00239.html (10,199 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Sun Apr 25 10:48:55 1999; Yup. This is the corrective action I am taking after having enough stupid mistakes to keep me from moving up a position in the CW results. SF won't be logged, and I need to enter either SFL or SFO.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00244.html (7,710 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Sun Apr 25 14:51:52 1999; Hi, Is this an abbreviation problem, or is it best used as an opportunity to remind people that even though LA and LAX are close, you still ``just gotta get it right.'' Most LAX guys I worked last ye; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00249.html (7,112 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1): Author: rbowen@iglobal.net (Ralph Bowen); Date: Mon Apr 26 00:10:48 1999; I always thought part of contesting was to develop an edge over the competition. In my younger days I made it a point to learn the CORRECT abbreviations for the names used by the inhabitants to descr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00252.html (8,337 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]