Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+LOTW\s+Again\!\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:26:40 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I agree with the storyline of G3XTT except for one "unmentioned" aspect. The availability of a QSL card, for sure, but the availability "to the masses" cheap (ie, the bureau), no. I for one will be t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00081.html (9,220 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Marc Domen, ON7SS" <Marc.Domen@skynet.be>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:42:07 +0200
Hi Ed, Please bare in mind that LoTW only suports ARRL Awards and no other for the moment. What about those guys who aren't interested in ARRL Awards? 73 Marc, ON7SS ** Amateur radio station ON7SS Ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00084.html (10,916 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:46:52 -0400
for the Exactly! Don't expect to get WAZ, 5BWAZ, WPX, or USA-CA using LOTW. 73! Nat, WZ3AR -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00086.html (8,865 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 01:17:31 -0000
I'm sure ARRL will open up confimration info to other organizations, for a fee, once the system is fully up and running. It's in everyone's interest to do so. Barry W2UP (already 1100 QSL records in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00088.html (9,360 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:24:02 -0400
for the Exactly! Don't expect to get WAZ, 5BWAZ, WPX, or USA-CA using LOTW. ARRL is betting that the LotW facility will become popular enough that CQ, DARC, RGSB et al will sign up too. It would seem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00089.html (9,657 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:27:14 -0400
"Exactly! Don't expect to get WAZ, 5BWAZ, WPX, or USA-CA using LOTW." Oh? Why not? Has CQ Communications said that they won't support LotW? That's certainly news to me... C'mon guys. The League has s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00090.html (10,458 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 01:41:00 -0000
Nat, My guess is that CQ, RSGB, JARL and possibly others will jump on board in the future. Don't rule them out! Bernie, W3UR -- Bernie McClenny, W3UR Editor of The Daily DX, The Weekly DX and How's D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00091.html (10,252 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:17:11 -0000
Why not? It only requires CQ operating awards committee to become a card carrying member of the "LOTW society". I suspect that if everyone wanted to, this could be done quickly. I really hope this is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00093.html (10,105 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Rich Dailey, KA8OKH" <okh.npi@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:37:33 +0000
Although - I would expect ARRL would be very receptive to it ($$). Rich -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00098.html (8,751 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Macie, Gordon" <GMacie@innotrac.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:24:49 -0400
A QSO involdes is a 2 way contact. Maybe the other station is interested in an ARRL Award. 73, Gordon, N4LR Hi Ed, Please bare in mind that LoTW only suports ARRL Awards and no other for the moment.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00101.html (9,057 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:27:24 -0000
I doubt (and hope I am right) that ARRL will charge CQ to provide this. The user is paying for this in the "QSL credit" fee. That is as it should be. By the way, it appears that it is not impossible
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00102.html (9,986 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1)
Author: "ted demopoulos" <kr1g@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:12:15 +0000
Exactly! Don't expect to get WAZ, 5BWAZ, WPX, or USA-CA using LOTW. 73! Nat, WZ3AR This is EXACTLY what I DO expect!!! Just give it some time 73. Ted KT1V, not phasing out paper _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00122.html (8,958 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu