Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Meeting\s+FCC\s+RF\s+Guidelines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Meeting\s+FCC\s+RF\s+Guidelines\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Meeting FCC RF Guidelines (score: 1): Author: nt5c@easy.com (John Warren); Date: Tue Dec 30 02:04:17 1997; I don't imagine for a moment that the FCC has the manpower to go after any of us without prompting, except perhaps in the most blatant cases. The real problem is that the new regulations will provide; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00471.html (7,626 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Meeting FCC RF Guidelines (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Tue Dec 30 03:30:22 1997; I would take a moment to dissagree with you John. Anyone that knows the possible ramifications of close RF Fields on an individuals health would surely know the pain and bitterness that taking an unf; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00475.html (7,588 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Meeting FCC RF Guidelines (score: 1): Author: N3BB@easy.com (Jim George, N3BB); Date: Tue Dec 30 06:41:26 1997; You are right,John, but only to a point. This is a weapon which can be used against the amateur in a hostile action such as zoning regulations. But it is a legal weapon on our side as well. How would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00476.html (8,349 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: Meeting FCC RF Guidelines (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER); Date: Tue Dec 30 09:07:51 1997; I've done the calcs and I'm OK in both environments. Interesting comments from both points of view. Personally, I think we are both cursed and blessed by this. Cursed in that we face potential threat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00490.html (7,542 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]